On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Frank Gmeindl <
fgmeindl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Aira Loren Burkhart wrote:
>
> Well, who do we want to attend the class, or who do we think might possibly
> be persuaded to bicycle who isn't already?
>
>
> Good question. My first response is: everybody. If I had to segment and
> prioritize, my first rough target would be those that would make the biggest
> switch to riding their bikes from driving their cars. Now, who would they
> be? I'll just throw out a couple of guesses: people who:
> * have experienced the joy and freedom of cycling but find some impediments
> to riding now
> * can tolerate getting somewhere a few minutes later than driving or being
> driven
> * are in fair or better physical condition
> * want to drive their cars less
>
> that's the heart of the marketing problem.
>
> who's our target?
> students? (what kind?)
> people who live within 2 miles of school or work?
> the eldery?
> the unhealthy who want to be healthy?
> triathletes?
> runners?
> people with bike racks on their cars?
> flyers on any and all bicycles seem parked around town?
>
> if we could decide who we wanted to attend the class (cyclists or
> noncyclists), we could figure out how to reach them.
>
> aira
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Frank Gmeindl <
fgmeindl@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That's easy for him to "say". The issue is what is there about the course
>> that would want to make people tell other people about it?
>> Frank
>> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Aira Loren Burkhart wrote:
>>
>> one more note, Andrew Walker thinks we should, per his text message, "Go
>> more viral, grassroots."
>>
>> If anyone has thoughts on what that might mean, apart from or in
>> additional to papering the town in hip illustrated posters, I'd like to hear
>> your thoughts.
>>
>> aira
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Aira Loren Burkhart <
airaloren@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> My friend Sommer (a designer in Dallas) thinks that if we initially
>>> charge, we can also then have coupons or vouchers. "Buy a bike, get free
>>> lessons, a $100 value!" Might help sell some bicycles too!
>>>
>>> $45 is okay, but [confession] John and I paid $190 a person for a weekend
>>> of all day ski lessons a fee weeks ago. "For $190 a person, it better be
>>> good!" was what I said.... and it was!
>>>
>>> I think most people care more about saving time than saving money. The
>>> ski class advertised "Improve your skiing by 3-5 years in a weekend." Now,
>>> that's value! The CCC course offers the same kind of knowledge, eliminating
>>> years of trial and error. So, we should pitch it more from that angle.
>>>
>>> "save 3-5 years" justifies a substantial price, doesn't it?
>>>
>>> there were 15-20 people in the ski class and every one said they'd
>>> persuade friends to take it in the future. the price definitely didn't hurt
>>> enrollment.
>>>
>>> aira
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Frank Gmeindl <
fgmeindl@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Aira and Chip. The question is, how much should we charge
>>>> to get the most people to take the course? If we're going to change the
>>>> price, we must change it ASAP since we already have pricing info on the
>>>> course calendar.
>>>>
>>>> Here's how I arrived at the current $45 price. Three years ago, before
>>>> I started teaching Traffic Skills 101, I did a very cursory search of the
>>>> web for other cities' pricing. I found prices at 3 cities. Prices ranged
>>>> from $30 to $90. $90 was in CA. $30 was in NC. So, I set a strawman price
>>>> of $60. Then, on rides with MonBikeClub cyclists, I asked 6 riders
>>>> separately what they thought of the $60 price. A couple said it was too
>>>> high but $30-35 seemed reasonable. I set the price at $45.
>>>> I think it would be an excellent idea for someone to do more research on
>>>> prevailing pricing.
>>>> Just FYI, if we teach 4 participants/class with 2 instructors getting
>>>> paid $25/hr, we'd have to charge $163/participant to break even (includes
>>>> text books and other necessary expenses). If we had 8 participants, we
>>>> would break even at $89/participant. So, Ryan, don't get your hopes up for
>>>> a pay raise. (Remember, the grant absorbs losses.)
>>>> So, what should we charge?
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Ryan Post wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ya, I’m fine with that, then you can pay the instructors more!
>>>>
>>>> That principle was actually talked about during the LCI class, put a
>>>> value on something and people want it more. However, I’d still argue that
>>>> it doesn’t matter if they don’t know about the course. So problem is still
>>>> getting word out. I wonder if businesses are willing to incorporate it into
>>>> their bonus programs? I know my old company required everyone to take some
>>>> extra classes to get bonuses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Chip Wamsley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>>> From: Aira Loren Burkhart <
airaloren@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:35:32 -0500
>>>>
>>>> I agree with Aira, putting a value on the course is important and if
>>>> people pay, they will show up. I think we are already requiring folks to
>>>> pay first, and then complete the course to get money back--correct?
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>> From: Aira Loren Burkhart [mailto:
airaloren@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 5:36 PM
>>>> To:
chip@wamsleycycles.com
>>>> Cc: Jim Rye; Gunnar Shogren; Marilyn Newcome; Ryan Post; Elizabeth
>>>> Shogren;
Hugh.Kierig@mail.wvu.edu; chip wamsley; Don Spencer; Paul Becker;
>>>> Frank Gmeindl; Bicycle Board
>>>> Subject: Re: Course participation
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know this will sound funny, but maybe this course should cost more?
>>>>
>>>> (I'm just brainstorming, so you might disagree)
>>>>
>>>> There is definitely a psychology to pricing and making the course
>>>> free/very cheap might be making it seem like it's not an important class or
>>>> like the content is low quality or something.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the course should be advertised as costing $100 or another high
>>>> number more similar to classes people pay to take, like dancing, or music,
>>>> or art classes? Charging a lot might make it seem exclusive and legitimize
>>>> the course content.
>>>>
>>>> I think people pay more attention and have better attendance when they
>>>> have already committed their money to something. They have to then "get
>>>> their money's worth" by working hard and focusing. People sell out expensive
>>>> rock concerts but you can't expect to "pack the park" for a free community
>>>> concert. And that's because it's free, not because the content is different.
>>>>
>>>> Is this making sense to anyone else?
>>>>
>>>> "You get what you pay for" and so far, no one is getting [from us] what
>>>> they aren't paying for, right?
>>>>
>>>> So, let's charge a lot for it and see if people would prefer to pay to
>>>> play.
>>>>
>>>> aira
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Chip Wamsley <
chip@wamsleycycles.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>>> From: Frank Gmeindl <
fgmeindl@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:52:54 -0500
>>>>
>>>> Frank et al,
>>>>
>>>> I think the new business cards will be a help, 1) if bike board members
>>>> hand them out to friends to direct them to the website to get the CCC class
>>>> schedule--I'll be able to use lots at the shop 2) an 8 1/2 x 11 poster on
>>>> heavier paper that could be put up at the bike shops, rec center, coop,
>>>> moose, black bear, laundromats, around campus etc. . . to briefly describe
>>>> course and drive people to the class--the same poster in slide form on the
>>>> city TV channel should also work well.
>>>>
>>>> Chip
>>>>
>>>> >Education Committee members,
>>>> >
>>>> >The Mar - Sep 2010 courses are scheduled at
>>>> >
http://bikemorgantown.com/calendar.php . Recommendations for getting
>>>> > people to attend?
>>>> >
>>>> >Ads in the Dominion Post and Daily Athenaeum might make sense although
>>>> > I'd say last year, the ad in the paper actually brought less than 4
>>>> > participants.
>>>> >
>>>> >Other ideas?
>>>> >
>>>> >Frank
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bikeboard mailing list
>>
Bikeboard@cheat.org
>>
http://cheat.org/mailman/listinfo/bikeboard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bikeboard mailing list
>
Bikeboard@cheat.org
>
http://cheat.org/mailman/listinfo/bikeboard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bikeboard mailing list
>
Bikeboard@cheat.org
>
http://cheat.org/mailman/listinfo/bikeboard
>