Re: agenda -- I was planning to discuss the "Bike Safety Bill" we introduced last year and to determine if we want to modify it in any way for the upcoming session. I think Frank's email that he just sent is a great place to start with our discussion. We will also discuss if there are any additional pieces of legislation that we could pursue given our resources. Things mentioned to date: uniform code on public trails regarding trespass (ATVs mostly); license plate special funding. Please let me know if I'm missing anything. Thanks, kasey
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Emmett Pepper epepper@vt.edu wrote:
Is there an agenda for this conference call/meeting?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Frank Gmeindl fgmeindl@gmail.com wrote:
Kasey,
I would like to encourage WVCC to forget about a 3-foot passing rule and instead concentrate on repealing 17C-11-5 (a) which requires cyclists to ride as far to the right as practicable.
3-foot laws are not enforced and may not be enforceable. 3-feet is not enough when a 55 mph tractor trailer passes a 10 mph cyclist. (See attached Rutgers 3-foot final report.)
Riding far to the right leads to
- Motorists passing bicyclists too closely;
- Motorists intruding into the adjacent lane when there is on-coming
traffic;
- Right-turning vehicles crashing into cyclists at intersections and
driveways;
- On-coming left-turning vehicles crashing into cyclists;
- Overtaking vehicles crashing into left-turning cyclists;
- Cyclists crashing because of objects, debris; pedestrians; animals and
surface hazards that are more prevalent at the right edge of the roadway. (See attached talking point paper.)
Bicyclists that control the lane are almost always passed by the overtaking motorist making a full lane change, giving between 6 to 8 feet of passing clearance. If you have ridden this way, you know it is true. Why ask/plead/beg for 3 feet when predominant behavior secures more than twice that much passing margin and better passing behavior (lane changes instead of straddle and in-lane passes)?
Three foot passing laws are a bad reaction to the consequences of riding too far right. If you want passing space, solve the problem by eliminating the FTR law instead of applying a patch or "fix" such as a three foot passing law that doesn't address or solve the root cause of close passing.
We should also continue to pursue repeal of 17C-11-5 (c) which requires cyclists to use a side-path when available and not the roadway.
Frank D. Gmeindl LCI #1703 491 Wilson Avenue Morgantown, WV 26501 304-376-0446 *Cyclists fare best when they act and are treated as drivers of vehicles*
On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Kasey Russell wrote:
Thanks everyone for your responses. We will meet at Steve Fowler's office at 901 Quarrier Street, Charleston on Monday, Nov. 18th at 10 am. Steve, looks like there will only be a few in person but we will need a conference phone as a few will call in. For those calling in please use our usual number: 641-715-3620; code is 877115#. Kasey
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Kasey Russell russell.kasey@gmail.comwrote:
Hello WVCC Members -- We would like to have a Legislative Committee meeting on Monday, Nov. 18th at 10:00 a.m. Would you all be able to attend either in person or via conference call? We will be meeting in Steve Fowler's office in downtown Charleston and will have access to a conference phone. Please let me know. I would expect our meeting to last 1 12/ hours. Thanks, kasey