And, more.
From: Damien Davis
[mailto:ddavis@cityofmorgantown.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 11:05 AM
To: Bill Austin; Frank Gmeindl; Terry Hough
Subject: RE: Morgantown Bicycle Lane
Bill, on the cross-sections of the Mon Blvd bike lane proposal I
show that the shoulder on the PRT side is between 8 and 13.5 feet wide. While
the bike lane side is between 7.5 to 13 feet wide
J. Damien Davis, EIT, CFM,
City of
Public Works Department - Engineering Division
Office: 304.284.7398
Fax: 304.284.7409
www.morgantown.com
From: Bill Austin
[mailto:baustin@moncpc.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 9:15 AM
To: 'Frank Gmeindl'; Damien Davis; Terry Hough
Subject: FW: Morgantown Bicycle Lane
Importance: High
Frank, Damien, Terry,
Please see the correspondence below. I do not believe the
proposed signage is adequate or acceptable for addressing the concern expressed
by the Bicycle Board. Previous correspondence I have seen says that the
shoulder on the down hill side of Mon Boulevard is the same width as on the
uphill side. I do not believe that this true. I don’t believe it is
either the same width or of the same pavement quality as the shoulder on the
uphill side. Can anyone confirm this for me?
The comment below that cyclists on the down slope cannot keep up
with traffic is simply a mis-expectation on the writers part. Cyclists should
not be expected to match speeds even on flat sections they should be expected
to not impede the flow of traffic. These are not the same things. We need to
address this misconception quickly. I am not sure how Jim Hudson fits into the
picture, I will look into it.
Please let me know your thoughts. I would like to respond to
this comment ASAP.
Thanks,
Bill
From: Hudson, Jim E
[mailto:Jim.E.Hudson@wv.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 8:54 AM
To: Robinson, Bill C
Cc: Keller, Perry J; Warner, Richard L; Lewis, Ray C; Shoukry, Fouad N;
Bill Austin
Subject: Morgantown Bicycle Lane
Bill
After much thought
on the Morgantown Bike Lane issue I think our signage should remain consistent with our
signage on other limited access highways. Therefore I propose we limit
our signage and roadway markings to those found along Route 50, Route 33, and
the East Beckley By-Pass among other places. These signs should be placed
on both sides of Monongahela
Boulevard and other locations where high-speed and/or high-density traffic and adequate
shoulders indicate it is necessary.
While I understand
the desire for a “climbing”
lane for bicycles, I do not accept the idea that average bicyclists (Class B) can safely maintain the speed of 45 to 50 mph
required to keep up with traffic on the downhill side of the road.
Bicyclists who want to
ride on the road
where the signs
I propose have been posted are in the same category as
those semi drivers who want to drive in the left lane where signage prohibiting
trucks in the left lane have been installed.
A photograph of the
signage used in these locations is attached to this email.
Jim Hudson
Community
Development Specialist
Building 5, Room
863
1900 Kanawha Blvd.
E.
Charleston, WV
25305-0430
(304) 558-9613
No virus
found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.123/2595 - Release Date: 01/05/10
02:35:00