Anyone want to prepare comments to EPA?
JBK
______________________________________________
From: David Baron
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Steve Roady; Jennifer Chavez; Emma Cheuse
Subject: West Virginia air pollution
All,
EPA has proposed to approve a West Virginia SIP that is supposed to provide for general implementation of PM2.5 standards in the state. This is not a SIP to bring nonattainment areas into attainment -- those are done separately -- …
[View More]but this SIP is supposed to set up the infrastructure for implementing the PM2.5 standards throughout the state, including monitoring requirements, adequate enforcement authority, adequate resources to administer and enforce permitting and other requirements, and miscellaneous other provisions. We contend that states are also required to ensure through these SIPs that they have in place adequate PSD programs for PM2.5: EPA disagrees, claiming that the states can address PSD requirements in a separate SIP.
I have not followed the West Virginia air program, but thought you might want to pass this along to Joe, Derek and other interested folks in WV, in case they want to comment. This is a good opportunity for folks to raise any concerns they have about the adequacy of the state's air pollution control program, whether it's inadequate monitoring, deficient legal authority, inadequate resources for oversight, weak enforcement authority, or other matters. I'm planning to put together some short comments addressing some basic legal issues, but don't know enough about the state of things there to do much more than that. Relevant documents are attached. Comments are due June 16.
David
______________________________________
David Baron
Managing Attorney
Earthjustice
1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 702
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 667-4500 Ext. 203 (phone)
(202) 667-2356 (fax)
dbaron(a)earthjustice.org <mailto:dbaron@earthjustice.org>
[View Less]
Science 28 May 2010:
Vol. 328. no. 5982, p. 1085
DOI: 10.1126/science.328.5982.1085
News of the Week - - - Climate Change:
NRC Reports Strongly Advocate Action on Global Warming
Richard A. Kerr and Eli Kintisch
The three reports released last week by the National Academies' National Research Council (NRC) had a familiar theme—the human-induced warming of the planet—but the tone, especially as presented to the public, was less familiar. The 2-year effort involving 90 scientists "…
[View More]emphasizes why the United States should act now," Ralph Cicerone, president of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), said at a public briefing. The reports also have a few words about how the nation should act, which might influence a lively debate on a proposed Senate climate bill.
The science supporting the why of action on climate change recalled the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). "Climate change is occurring, Earth is warming," said environmental scientist Pamela Matson of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, chair of the NRC panel on advancing the science of climate change, one of three separate panels that produced the trio of reports. "These climate changes are largely caused by human activities."
But this was no rehashing of the IPCC report, which has taken considerable flak of late. The new NRC reports draw on the past 5 years of peer-reviewed literature, which was published too late for inclusion in the IPCC analysis, Matson emphasized. They also reflect findings from more than a score of reports from the U.S. Global Change Research Program and earlier efforts from NAS. The membership of the three NRC panels also had little overlap with that of the IPCC's working groups, says economist Gary Yohe of Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut, an IPCC veteran who was on the NRC panel on adapting to climate change. Yohe says he was surprised to find at the panel's inaugural meeting that three-quarters of his fellow members were unfamiliar to him.
Call to action. Ralph Cicerone introduced climate reports detailing why the nation should act now.
[Larger version of this image]
Although NRC tasked the panel on limiting the magnitude of future climate change with providing "policy-relevant (but not policy-prescriptive) input," the panel did recommend that "the United States set a future greenhouse gas emissions target in the form of an emissions budget," said panel chair Robert Fri of Resources for the Future in Washington, D.C. And the NAS press release said a "reasonable goal" would be emissions of 170 to 200 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2012 through 2050.
In recommending a carbon budget and a target range, the panels "did go farther than IPCC could," says climate scientist Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who was not involved in the NRC reports. "There were more words like ‘should’ than you normally have with IPCC." And the press release takes the emission budget goal a step further, noting that it is "a goal that is roughly in line with the range of emission reduction targets proposed recently by the Obama Administration and members of Congress."
But can the report help bolster the proposals' chances of becoming law? "That's the $64,000 question," says ecologist Peter Frumhoff of the Union of Concerned Scientists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The House of Representatives passed a bill that would probably keep the United States under the emissions budget, but action has been slow in the Senate.
There, senators John Kerry (D–MA) and Joe Lieberman (ID–CT) have introduced a package with the same goals as the House version's but more flexibility and with subsidies for nuclear and fossil fuel industries. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) recently announced a go-slow approach, which might see votes as late as July. But elections loom in the fall, and climate lobbyists worry that the closer elections get, the more hyperpartisan the atmosphere will be.
It's unclear whether science can change that. Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., rattles off a number of Democrats in the House who supported last year's bill but have either publicly repudiated their vote or retired. "Cap-and-trade is dead," he says. Said a Senate staffer: "I'm hoping this will help push the issue, but I don't think we are at a place where scientific reports can find that influence."
[View Less]
Having trouble viewing this email? www.gasp-pgh.org
GASPalerts
Action and News from
Group Against Smog and Pollution
JOIN OUR LIST
IN THIS ISSUE
Upcoming Events
Become a member of GASP today
May 27, 2010
Take Action
Join GASP, Pittsburgh United, Clean Water Action, and the Sierra Club for the introduction of important Clean Water and Clean Air Legislation in Pittsburgh.
Councilman Bill Peduto, lead sponsor of the …
[View More]legislation, will introduce two bills, one related to storm water run-off in major economic development projects and one related to reducing diesel emissions during construction of major projects on Tuesday, June 1st, 2010.
We need you there to show support for these important pieces of legislation.
Press Conference
9:30am, Tuesday, June 1st
5th Floor, City County Building
414 Grant St., Pittsburgh, 15219
Let us know if you are able to attend by emailing gasp(a)gasp-pgh.org
The Issues:
Reducing Diesel Emissions
Let us know if you are able to attend by emailing gasp(a)gasp-pgh.org
The Issues:
Reducing Diesel Emissions
Diesel emissions harm our health, our environment and our
economy. Publicly-funded development should be a partner in protecting our health and environment.
Diesel soot cancer risk in Pittsburgh area is 408 times greater than EPA's acceptable cancer level of 1 in a million. Our risk is 1 in 2,449.
Pittsburgh area workers are projected to miss 13,558 days of work in 2010 because of unnecessary exposure to diesel fine particles
Kids' emergency room visits for asthma-like symptoms are 400% higher in Pittsburgh than other cities
Black carbon, emitted by diesels, is one of the largest contributing pollutants to global warming
This clean construction legislation will require that contracts for publicly-funded development in the City of Pittsburgh must ensure that all diesel vehicles on site have the Best Available Diesel Control Technology installed and that ultra low sulfur diesel fuel is used in construction vehicles.
Mitigating Storm Water Run-off
During heavy rainstorms, storm water run-off forces un-treated sewage into our rivers. Publicly funded development should lead the way in innovative techniques to control and drastically reduce this problem.
During nearly two thirds of the days of our city's boating season, the water is not safe to touch.
The current estimate for ALCOSAN's portion of the EPA mandated repairs to its system is estimated to be from $3 billion to as much as $20 billion.
Most of us get our drinking water from the three rivers
The Clean Water bill will require developments that receive our tax dollars to drastically reduce their storm water run-off.
Upcoming Event
GASLAND
When: Saturday, June 5th
7:00pm-10:00pm, doors open at 6:15pm
Where: Byham Theater, 101 Sixth St., Pittsburgh, PA 15222
What: Award-winning documentary on the impacts of drilling for natural gas
Panel Discussion following movie featuring: Myron Arnowitt (Clean Water Action), Representative Dave Levdansky, Ned Mulcahy (Three Rivers Waterkeeper), John Stolz (Duquesne University), Conrad Dan Volz (CHEC)
Moderated by Josh Fox, GASLAND filmmaker
Admission is FREE
For more information call 412-624-9379 or 412-765-3053
www.gaslandthemovie.com
Thank you to everyone who attended, Before You Flip That Switch: The Hidden Costs of Energy. If you missed the event, the presentation by Dr. Jared Cohon, President of Carnegie Mellon University, can be found on the GASP website.
Thanks to our event sponsors: AJ Stones - Master Green Remodeler, West Penn Energy Solutions & Vox Energy Solutions.
Help us be as effective as possible by becoming a member or renewing your membership today.
Over the last forty years, through education, advocacy, helping to set regional and local environmental policy, and at times entering into litigation, GASP has made a positive impact on our region's air quality and environment. Help us to continue this important work in 2010.
Gift memberships also available!
Membership details and instructions for donating can be found here.
We appreciate your participation on the GASPalerts email list. Working together, we can make a difference in our region's environment. We won't trade or sell your address with other organizations or inundate you with mailings. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Group Against Smog and Pollution
and Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition
[View Less]
TO: Members and friends of MVCAC. Email me your mailing address if you need
a copy of the CD described below.
Duane Nichols
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-----Original Message-----
From: WV Public …
[View More]Service Commission <docketnotify(a)psc.state.wv.us>
To: duane330(a)aol.com
Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 5:10 pm
Subject: [PSC Docket] Activity on PSC Case 08-1521-E-C(Barbara Born, et al. v. Longview Power, LLC)
The case 08-1521-E-C (Barbara Born, et al. v. Longview Power, LLC) has had the following activity :
Activity Date: 05/25/2010
Activity Description: Pursuant to March 18, 2010, Order- Copies of PA Permits- (on CD), filed by Counsel for Longview Power, LLC (closed entry)
Click here to view associated document.
[View Less]
Meeting today with the DEP! A friend posted this on FaceBook:
Public Coal Mine Waste Disposal Meeting
The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection has scheduled a
public meeting for this coming Wednesday, May 26th. This will be an
informal conference to discuss the proposed disposal of coal ash,
starting at 6:00 pm at the Scott's Run Volunteer Fire Dept in Cassville.
The purpose is to hear public comments and concerns about a new 225 acre
surface mine and modifications to an …
[View More]associated National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System permit.
Translation: Two enormous fly ash disposal sites are being proposed
right here in our very own county. The industry intends to stockpile an
unfathomable quantity of toxic coal waste here for years and years to
come. Residents need to demand that the impact of this be evaluated
using the most recent testing criteria (not the much-less-stringent old
standards): that containment be provided to keep the toxins out of
groundwater; and more.
You don't need to be an expert. (Who was it who said that there are
experts in small things, but, "In morality, there are no experts.") Many
warm bodies are needed at this 'conference' to indicate that yes, we are
paying attention.
Industry wants to classify these landfills as "beneficial use" of land,
rather than as the hazardous waste dumps that they are, thus bypassing
regulations to require safety measures for our protection. And this is
happening now, when the national focus on cancer prevention has taken a
dramatic turn toward the dangers of environmental toxins.
How history will remember US depends on what we do about this, now. You
CAN attend this meeting and learn what is going on right under your
nose. We have a chance this time.
[View Less]
Public Coal Mine Waste Disposal Meeting
The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection has scheduled a
public meeting for this coming Wednesday, May 26th. The will be an
informational meeting to discuss the proposed disposal of coal ash, starting at
6:00 pm at the Scott's Run Volunteer Fire Dept in Cassville. The purpose is
to hear public comments and concerns about a new 225 acre surface mine and
modifications to an associated National Pollution Discharge Elimination
…
[View More]System permit.
The State government released the following information on May 21st:
"The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's Division of
Mining
and Reclamation is facilitating an Informal Conference on Patriot Mining
Company's applications for an Article 3 surface mining permit (no.
S200909) and
Article 11 permit WV1017535, Modification # 9, located northeast of
Cassville in
Clay District of Monongalia County. For more information, contact the
permit
supervisor at 304-457-3219 in the Philippi Office."
This meeting is open to the public; and, citizen participation is
encouraged by the
Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition, Duane Nichols (spokesperson), 304-216-5535.
Submitted by:
Duane G. Nichols, Ph.D.
Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition
330 Dream Catcher Circle
Morgantown, WV 26508
_duane330(a)aol.com_ (mailto:duane330@aol.com)
(304) 599-8040
[View Less]
From: Carrie Traud <_carrie(a)theclean.org_ (mailto:carrie@theclean.org) >
Date: Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Subject: CLEAN unveils new interactive map of coal and nuclear plants
To: mvcac
Hello CLEAN friends!
CLEAN is proud to unveil a great new tool - an interactive, detailed map
of coal and nuclear plants in the US: _http://www.theclean.org/mapping.html_
(http://www.theclean.org/mapping.html) . I encourage you and your members
to explore the map and see what's operating near …
[View More]you!
The mapping project is ongoing, with layers on coal and nuclear waste and
others in the works. Since even the EPA doesn't have all the data on these
waste dumps, we need alert citizen activists to point us in the right
direction. If you know of a waste dump that's off the radar, please report it
here (for coal): _http://web.theclean.org/coal_plant.html_
(http://web.theclean.org/coal_plant.html) and here (for nuclear):
_http://web.theclean.org/nuke_plant.html_ (http://web.theclean.org/nuke_plant.html) .
As always, please contact me with any questions, comments or concerns.
for a clean energy future,
Carrie
--
Carrie Traud
Southern Coordinator, CLEAN Call to Action
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth
859-801-2871
_http://theclean.ning.com_ (http://theclean.ning.com/)
Twitter: kycarrie
[View Less]