MVCAC

mvcac@lists.osenergy.org

1015 discussions

Coal is king among pollution that causes heart disease, study says - The Washington Post
by Duane 02 Dec '15

02 Dec '15

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/coal-is-king-among-p… Coal is king among pollution that causes heart disease, study says - The Washington Post By Darryl Fears, Washington Post, December 2, 2015 Exposure to emissions from coal-fired power plants over a long period of time is significantly more harmful to the heart than other forms of carbon pollution, a new study says. The risk of death from heart disease, including heart attacks, was five times higher for people who breathed pollution from coal emissions over 20 years than for those who were exposed to other types of air pollution, according to the study’s findings. The burning of coal releases fine particles with a potent mix of toxins, including arsenic and selenium. “Our results indicate that, pound for pound, coal-burning particles contribute roughly five times as much to heart disease mortality risk as the average air pollution particle in the United States,” said George D. Thurston, a professor of population health and environmental medicine at New York University and lead author of the study. [EPA rule on greenhouse gases latest blow to King Coal] Thurston and the study’s 10 other authors said that their findings should end assumptions in previous studies that carbon “particles have the same toxicity, irrespective of their source.” And they said the findings show the Environmental Protection Agency’s effort to strengthen regulation of power plant emissions standards — as part of the White House’s Clean Power Plan — does not go far enough. The EPA’s calculations for lowering air pollution with stricter coal emission standards nationwide are wrong, the research shows, because the estimates are based on the assumption that particles from all sources of carbon pollutions are equally toxic and carry the same risks. Windblown particles from dust in Phoenix is far less toxic than emissions from coal-burning power plants in Pittsburgh. And urban motor traffic in Los Angeles produces emissions that are about half as toxic as coal, Thurston said. “You have to look at the various sources,” he said. “If we want to clean particles, where should we start? We should start with the particles that are most toxic.” Thurston said governments across the world have taken clean air models from the United States and applied them without considering that the level of danger is higher or lower depending on the pollution source. “In the Arab world, there are high levels of particle pollution, but they’re from windblown soil,” Thurston said. “You think those are the same as coal? They’re not.” The study, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, released early Wednesday to coincide with the world climate talks in Paris. The EPA said in August that its plan would lower power plant carbon pollution that causes “the soot and smog that harm health, while advancing clean energy innovation,” according to its Web site. The agency estimated that it would help Americans avoid 1,700 heart attacks and 3,600 premature deaths. Nearly half of the nation’s state attorneys general filed lawsuits seeking to block the new regulations when they were finalized in September. Patrick Morrisey, West Virginia’s attorney general, called the plan “one of the most far-reaching energy regulations in this nation’s history.” Air pollution has been identified by the World Health Organization as a major health threat linked to heart disease across the globe. In the United States, it causes 1 in every 5 heart disease-related deaths, according to the American Heart Association. The study relied on a trove of data collected between 1982 and 2004 by the American Cancer Society, which sent hundreds of volunteers to question about 1 million people about their health. The coal study examined information collected from about 450,000 people who lived in areas where pollution exposure data was available. To reduce the number of people dying from air pollution worldwide, Thurston and his colleagues said, there must be a stronger emphasis on reducing coal emissions. [States sue to block EPA emissions rule — even as some try to comply] Aruni Bhatnagar, a University of Louisville professor of cardiovascular medicine and a volunteer with American Heart Association, called the study’s finding’s surprising because of the long-held assumption in previous studies: All sources of pollution “have the same lethality,” he said. Before now, there had only been talk, based on expert guesses, that coal emissions could be “more toxic than other particles,” Bhatnagar said. See also: www.FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

Unearthing The Fossil Fuels In Mutual Funds
by Duane 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

http://www.fa-mag.com/news/unearthing-the-fossil-fuels-in-mutual-funds-2368… Unearthing The Fossil Fuels In Mutual Funds NOVEMBER 2, 2015 • CAROL J. CLOUSE, Financial Advisor Magazine If you’re into green investing, do you really know what’s in your portfolio? Andrew Behar, the CEO of As You Sow, an Oakland, Calif.-based nonprofit that works with shareholders to promote corporate responsibility, discovered he didn’t when he began digging around in the mutual funds of his employer-sponsored 401(k). “I realized, and it took me hours to find out, that I owned all of the companies we’re engaged with: Exxon, Chevron, Halliburton,” Behar says. “In four of the seven funds that I owned, I was up to my neck in fossil fuels.” That was a problem for an organization that rallies investors to hold companies accountable on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues, with climate change being one of the biggies. So in the name of practicing what they preach, As You Sow switched to a green retirement plan and developed a tool that allows investors to unearth the fossil-fuel company stocks (coal companies, oil/gas producers and fossil-fired utilities) in their own mutual funds, without spending hours doing so. The organization then partnered with investment research firm Morningstar—which provides the equity and mutual fund data—to launch Fossil Free Funds in September. Free and easily searchable, the Fossil Free Funds database currently holds information on 1,500 mutual funds, chosen largely based on net assets and the number of retirement plans using them. Some smaller socially responsible funds were also included to provide options for investors who want to switch. Typing in a fund’s name or ticker lets you see the percentage of its assets, if any, that are invested in companies linked to fossil fuels. For now, the data represents only open-end funds or exchange-traded funds with at least 50% in equities, though As You Sow plans to add fixed-income products. Behar says he hopes the transparency created by Fossil Free Funds will put pressure on companies to offer more fossil-free options in the retirement plans of their employees. Putting Fossil Free Funds to the test, I typed in the ticker symbols of the two Fidelity mutual funds my husband and I own. The first, which invests in information technology, came up clean. The second, a global stock fund, turned out to be slightly dirty with 3.45% invested in companies such as Cabot Oil & Gas, Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron. However, I ran into a roadblock when I tried to look into my 401(k), a plan sponsored by a former employer and run by Charles Schwab, which I’ve lazily held on to as a freelancer. Nearly 70% of my 401(k) assets are invested in a collective trust fund, a fund type exclusive to institutional investors and therefore exempt from disclosure requirements. In other words, to the extent that a retirement plan doesn’t use retail products, it becomes less penetrable. Of course, that doesn’t mean an employee can’t simply request socially responsible options, even if the particulars of their plan remain murky. This is something retirement plan administrators and financial advisors will likely see more of. Driven by a growing consensus that investing responsibly doesn’t mean sacrificing returns, demand for ESG products has risen considerably among both institutions and individuals and shows no signs of slowing. Between 2012 and 2014, ESG assets under management in the U.S. grew 76%, to $6.57 trillion from $3.74 trillion, according to a report from the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment. Morningstar has taken note and is developing ESG scores for global mutual funds and ETFs it aims to roll out by year’s end. See also: www.FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

Fwd: November calendar for Mon Group of Sierra Club
by Duane Nichols 01 Nov '15

01 Nov '15

> From: Sierra Club - West Virginia Chapter <jimscon(a)gmail.com> > Date: November 1, 2015 > Greetings ! > > We still need candidates to run in the Mon Group election for next year. Please let me know by November 7 if you know of anyone who might be interested in serving. sallywilts(a)yahoo.com > > Sierra Calendars are available for purchase and make great Christmas gifts. Wilderness calendars are $12 and desk calendars are $13. Contact Candice Elliott at celliot2(a)comcast.net > > ***Monday November 9, 6-8 PM, Gaston Caperton Center, 501 West Main St., Clarksburg > JOBS IN THE NEW ENERGY ECONOMY - Forum co-sponsored by the WV Sierra Club Energy Efficiency Campaign and the North Central WV Democracy for America. This forum will emphasize the economic benefits of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. > For information, contact Laura Yokochi (304) 695-1523, lyokochi(a)aol.com OR Autumn Long (304) 796-4677, autumnlong11(a)gmail.com. > > ***Saturday November 14 > Chapter Executive Committee Meeting in Doddridge County. Members welcome. Contact Liz Wiles for more information. Liz_wiles(a)comcast.net > > ***Saturday, November 14 > Autumn Adopt-a-Trail Service Outing: Coopers Rock SF > rated easy hiking; easy to moderate work intensity -- Join the fun with the fall trail maintenance for Sierra Club's adopted Intermediate Cross Country Ski Trail at Cooper's Rock South. Fall clean-up emphasizes clearing fallen leaves, drainage restoration and trail clearing along a 1.25-mile loop. Volunteers should wear sturdy boots, and carry work gloves, water, snacks. Useful tools to bring are long handled pruners, rakes, and pointed shovels. Adults and adolescents are invited to help and those under 18 years of age must be accompanied by a parent or a legal guardian. Volunteers will be required to sign a standard Sierra Club Liability Waiver and a DNR Volunteer Work Program Agreement. Please pre-register with the leader. > Leader: Ann Devine-King, 304-594-2636, atdking(a)gmail.com > Nearest town: Morgantown, WV > Web info: http://www. coopersrockstateforest.com > > >> Activities with other groups: > > ***Wednesday November 4 from 6 to 9pm at Friends Meetinghouse, 648 Brockway, Morgantown (across from Superior Photo, just before you enter Marilla Park) > We are meeting to form a local chapter of Citizens Climate Lobby. > > Citizens' Climate Lobby is a non-profit, grassroots advocacy organization focused on national policies to address climate change. We train and support volunteers to reclaim their democracy and engage elected officials and the media to generate the political will for solutions that will stabilize the Earth's climate. > http://www.citizensclimatelobby.org > > Contact Kitty Lozier at clozier(a)gmail.com for more information >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > Morgantown Municipal Green Team Sponsors final community forum in the series: Air, Water and Waste: Where is Morgantown heading? Each session will be held 6-7:30 PM at the Morgantown Public Library, 373 Spruce Street > > ***Tuesday November 10 "Is Recycling Working in Morgantown and What Can We Do About It? "Sponsored by the Morgantown Green Team with speakers from City of Morgantown, Monongalia County, Republic Services and WVU. For more information call 703-463-7643 >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > ***November 11, 7PM : Science on Tap Presentation by Friends of Deckers Creek Project Manager, Nick Revetta. Morgantown Brewing Company. Come out and have a drink while learning more about the Deckers Creek Watershed! > Visit http://www. deckerscreek.org for more information on upcoming events > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > ***November 18, 2015 8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. > Straight Scoop on Shale Conference > University of Pittsburgh University Club, > 123 University Place > Presented by the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania's "Straight Scoop on Shale" initiative and hosted by the Pitt Graduate School of Public Health. > As in previous years, this year's conference will feature important new research on shale and public health impacts. Bruce Pitt PhD will present new research regarding birth impacts. Nationally known speaker and MacArthur Fellow Wilma Subra, who has served on EPA committees and currently chairs STRONGER's Air Quality policy and regulatory review committee, will discuss environmental health issues, air modeling, and ethane crackers based on her experiences in Louisiana. Brian Schwartz MD of Johns Hopkins, who is a Senior Investigator in the Geisinger Center for Health Research, will present research from the Geisinger data. See the website for other topics and presenters. > This year's conference includes a round-table brainstorming session where the public can interact with experts and civic leaders. > There is also a special breakout session on addressing shale issues in practice for those seeking professional credit hours. > More Information and Registration: 1-800-61-SHALE > Visit our website: http://shale.palwv.org > > Sierra Club 85 Second St., 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105

1 0

: [Morgantown LWV] Wednesday - Citizens Climate Lobby Meeting
by Duane 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

Begin forwarded message: > From: Judith Smith Wilkinson <jsw1403(a)hotmail.com> > Date: October 20, 2015 6:42:49 AM EDT > To: Judith Smith Wilkinson <JSW1403(a)HOTMAIL.COM> > Subject: Fwd: [Morgantown LWV] Wednesday - Citizens Climate Lobby Meeting > > > Please forward to other > concerned citizens. Hope to see you at this meeting. > >> From: Jonathan Rosenbaum <jr(a)wvcompletestreets.org> >> Date: October 20, 2015 at 2:38:06 AM EDT >> To: LWV Morgantown-Monongalia <morgantown(a)lwvwv.org> >> Subject: [Morgantown LWV] Wednesday - Citizens Climate Lobby Meeting >> >> The Natural Resources committee of LWVMM encourages you to attend a meeting of the Citizens Climate Lobby (CCL) this Wednesday, October 21, 6pm at the Morgantown Public Library. CCL is a non-profit, non-partisan, grassroots advocacy organization focused on national policies to address climate change. >> Learn about CCL's Carbon Fee and Dividend policy proposal. CCL hopes to establish a chapter in Morgantown. Currently, they have a chapters in Charleston and Huntington. >> >> The NR Committee has a strong interest in exploring ways to address climate change. For additional information, please contact Kitty Lozier <clozier(a)gmail.com> . >> >> -Jonathan Rosenbaum, League of Women Voters, et al. >> _______________________________________________ >> Duane Nichols, Cell- 304-216-5535, www.FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

First Green Team-sponsored forum on air quality a success!
by Duane330＠aol.com 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

____________________________________ From: pamela(a)cubberly.net To: morgantowngreenteam(a)googlegroups.com Sent: 10/12/2015 10:03:13 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time Subj: First Green Team-sponsored forum on air quality a success! Dear all, Our first community forum in our fall series "Air, Water, and Waste: Where Is Morgantown Heading?" attracted 21 folks in addition to Green Team members and speakers. Nearly all who signed our sign up sheet, also checked boxes for more information on participating in follow-up on this forum! Thanks to Duane Nichols of the Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition for organizing the speakers and facilitating the event! Our next forum on water quality is scheduled for Thursday, October 29 sponsored by Downstream Strategies and MUB and including their speakers as well as Rick Landerberger of WV Land Trust on green space and water quality. More details to come. Hope you will join us! Cheers, Pamela S. Cubberly, Cubberly & Associates 703-218-5417 (tel), 703-463-7643 (cell) Pamela(a)Cubberly.net >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: DEP Public Notice - County - Monongalia - Notice of Intent to Approve Permit R13-2068R for Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Chestnut Ridge Facility =========================================================== Thursday, October 1, 2015 @ 2:58 PM =========================================================== Notice of Intent to Approve On July 13, 2015, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. applied to the WV Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) for a permit to modify the Chestnut Ridge Facility located 781 Chestnut Ridge Road, Morgantown, Monongalia County, WV at latitude 39.65923 and longitude -79.95824. A preliminary evaluation has determined that all State and Federal air quality requirements will be met by the proposed facility. The DAQ is providing notice to the public of its preliminary determination to issue the permit as R13-2068R. No changes in potential annual emissions will be authorized by this permit action. Written comments or requests for a public meeting must be received by the DAQ before 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 2, 2015. A public meeting may be held if the Director of the DAQ determines that significant public interest has been expressed, in writing, or when the Director deems it appropriate. The purpose of the DAQ's permitting process is to make a preliminary determination if the proposed Modification will meet all State and Federal air quality requirements. The purpose of the public review process is to accept public comments on air quality issues relevant to this determination. Only written comments received at the address noted below within the specified time frame, or comments presented orally at a scheduled public meeting, will be considered prior to final action on the permit. All such comments will become part of the public record. Joe Kessler, PE, WV Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street, SE, Charleston, WV 25304 Telephone: 304/926-0499, ext. 1219, FAX: 304/926-0478 Additional information, including copies of the draft permit, application and all other supporting materials relevant to the permit decision may be obtained by contacting the engineer listed above. The draft permit and engineering evaluation can be downloaded at: _www.dep.wv.gov/daq/Pages/NSRPermitsforReview.aspx_ (http://www.dep.wv.gov/daq/Pages/NSRPermitsforReview.aspx)

1 0

How Clean is our Air --- Tonight at 6 pm, Morgantown Public Library
by Duane 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

Date: October 1, 2015 To: Community and Local Calendar Editor From: Pamela S. Cubberly, Morgantown Municipal Green Team (703-463-7643) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Green Team Holds First of Three Community Forums on Thursday, October 8: “How Clean Is Morgantown’s Air and What Can We Do About It?” Next Thursday, October 8, Morgantown area residents are invited to participate in a community forum on “How Clean Is Morgantown’s Air and What Can We Do About It?” The forum takes place at the Morgantown Public Library, 6:00pm–7:30pm (373 Spruce Street). Parking is available across the street. Organized by the Morgantown Green Team as part of its Green Nights at the Library, the forum is the first in a three-part series called “Air, Water, and Waste: Where Is Morgantown Heading?” The October 8th forum will be facilitated by Duane Nichols of the Mon Valley Clean Air Coalition, who will open the evening by addressing local concerns about air quality. Presenting the latest assessments of air quality in our area will be Tim Carroll, Assistant Director of Air Monitoring for the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection’s Division of Air Quality in Charleston, WV. Then Professor Michael McCawley, WVU Department of Occupational and Environmental Health Sciences, will present evidence on levels of ultra-fine particulate matter in our area as well as the rest of West Virginia. Air quality in the Morgantown area has long been of concern to many residents. The city’s record, although relatively good overall, has had certain worrying and seasonal exceptions, for example, ground-level ozone and fine particulate matter. In the summer, ozone measurements have sometimes reached EPA non-attainment levels along major traffic thoroughfares. Second in this series of community forums, “How Clean Is Morgantown’s Water and How Can We Keep It That Way?” takes place on Thursday, October 29. The third, “Is Recycling Working in Morgantown and What Can We Do About It?” takes place on Tuesday, November 10. Each event runs from 6:00pm to 7:30pm at the Morgantown Public Library (373 Spruce Street). The Morgantown Municipal Green Team is a group of citizens that advises the City of Morgantown on matters relating to sustainability in public policy, planning, education, departmental management, development, and evaluation of environmental and energy-related issues. For more information, please visit www.morgantownwv.gov/green/green-team. For more information on this and other Green Nights, please contact Pamela Cubberly, Morgantown Municipal Green Team at 703-463-7643 or Pamela(a)Cubberly.net. Duane Nichols, Cell- 304-216-5535, www.FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

Fwd: Methane pollution stops here!
by Duane Nichols 17 Sep '15

17 Sep '15

> From: Clean Air Council <members(a)cleanair.org> > Date: September 17, 2015 at 1:40:27 PM EDT > To: duane330(a)aol.com > Subject: Methane pollution stops here! > Reply-To: eroben(a)cleanair.org > > > > Dear MonValley Clean Air Coalition, > > 7.3 million metric tons. > > That's how much methane the gas industry spills into our nation's air every year. Considering that methane is 86 times worse for climate change than carbon dioxide and is emitted alongside air toxics and other unhealthy pollutants, that spells bad news for our future. > > This August, the EPA proposed the first ever rules to cut methane pollution. It's a good first step, but the rules don't go nearly far enough if we're serious about mitigating climate change and protecting public health. That's why we need you out there with us, telling the federal government and Pennsylvania that we're fed up with unchecked pollution from the gas industry and we expect the toughest rules possible. > > Will you join us to rally for clean air in Pittsburgh? > > > > We're organizing buses from several locations across the state, so RSVP below if you need transportation! > > State College, Altoona, Blairsville: http://bit.ly/1P3oTmu > > Harrisburg, Somerset, New Stanton: http://bit.ly/1KTCn6k > > Washington, Waynesburg: http://bit.ly/1KszK9J > > Let's make sure the EPA can't ignore our message that we deserve clean air and a stable climate. > > > See you in Pittsburgh, > > Joseph Otis Minott, Esq. > Executive Director > > PHILADELPHIA > > 135 S. 19th Street > Suite 300 > Philadelphia, PA 19103 > P: (215) 567-4004 > F: (215) 567-5791 > HARRISBURG > > 107 N. Front Street > Suite 113 > Harrisburg, PA 17101 > P: (717) 230-8806 > F: (717) 230-8808 > WILMINGTON > > 100 W. 10th Street > Suite 607 > Wilmington, DE 19801 > P: (302) 691-0112 > Unsubscribe > >

1 0

Re: [MVCAC] Optimized Citizen Air Sensors
by Duane 06 Sep '15

06 Sep '15

On Sep 6, 2015, at 2:44 PM, Jim Rosenberg <jr(a)amanue.com> wrote: > Duane, thanks! *Link please*?? << JIM, SEE BELOW >> > > I'm familiar with both Speck and Air Quality Egg, and have built my own from off-the-shelf parts using the same particulate sensor as is in the Egg and a similar one to the one in the Speck. But I don't know anything about Air Beam. > > The VOC sensor in the Air Quality Egg is really awful, BTW, pretty much worthless for what we need. The dust sensor is quite good, however. > > -Thanks, Jim >>>>>>>>>>>>> OBSERVER REPORTER, Washington, PA, September 5, 2015 Are cheap sensors and concerned citizens leading to a shift in air monitoring? By Natasha Khan, PublicSource, newsroom(a)observer-reporter.com It wouldn’t have happened five or 10 years ago. That’s what one expert said about the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency helping regular citizens – or “citizen scientists” – collect their own air quality data. “The idea that the EPA would take the lead, seemingly to promote community-collected data, would have been unthinkable,” said Gwen Ottinger, an assistant professor at the Center for Science, Technology and Society at Philadelphia’s Drexel University who studies how communities use developing technologies to measure air pollution near oil refineries. Some officials within the EPA have traditionally been skeptical of community-collected data, but the agency seems to be moving toward empowering communities to create their own studies, she said. Responding to an explosion of low-cost, easy-to-use sensors to monitor air quality in recent years, EPA scientists are studying the accuracy of these “next-generation air monitors,” and how the data collected might be used to improve communities and, eventually, affect how air quality is monitored and regulated. Right now, these sensors can cost as little as a few hundred dollars and have hip names, like Air Beam and Speck. They’re marketed as tools to empower citizens to learn about the air they breathe and to use their findings to take action – by, for instance, purchasing an air filtering system or choosing a less-polluted bike route. Air quality can be different from neighborhood to neighborhood. Or gas well to gas well. And environmental groups and citizens living around pollution sources have pushed governments – local, state and federal – for years to do more hyperlocal air monitoring, primarily to protect the health of people living close to these sites. That actually might be happening soon, but in a form that some wouldn’t have predicted. The development of low-cost air quality sensors, an increasingly aware and engaged public, and a government more willing to accept and help citizens collect data could mark a turning point in how air pollution is monitored and addressed in the country, experts told PublicSource. With scores of these air monitoring devices now available, citizens and the federal government want to know how well they work and how they can benefit from using them. Traditional air quality monitoring by regulators is done using expensive stationary equipment that takes averages of pollutants, like ozone and particulate matter, across a broad region. With citizen involvement, “can we go out there and obtain more data that we previously had not had the capabilities to obtain?” asked Ron Williams, a research chemist who is part of the effort to evaluate air quality sensors for the EPA’s Office of Research and Development. The answer may be ‘yes.’ In fact, citizen science projects contributed to policy changes and political action. For example, in a community-led study, trained volunteers took air samples near oil and gas sites in five states. They found eight volatile chemicals that exceeded federal health guidelines. It was one of the studies included in the New York health commissioner’s review of public health studies that led to the state’s fracking ban. EPA efforts New sensor technologies could supplement existing government air quality networks; make sure companies are complying with air quality regulations; and monitor people’s personal exposure to pollutants, Williams wrote in a 2013 paper he authored with other EPA researchers. “We have a vested interest in understanding this technology and trying to apply it for our own benefit,” he said. The EPA has been at this research effort for about three years. Right now, Williams said his team is comparing how well the new sensors perform against federal-grade monitors. “We consider that a major effort, because some of these sensors do not perform that well,” he said, but added they’re working with manufacturers to inform them of ways to improve sensor performance. But, when it comes to accuracy, not every sensor has to be as precise as government monitors, Williams said. For instance, if someone wants to figure out whether a pollutant is present in any concentration, he said “one doesn’t necessarily need to be able to measure to the ‘nth’ degree.” “Sensors have a wide range of applicability,” he said. The agency also offers resources for structuring citizen science projects, including a guidebook on how to develop an air monitoring project with a major emphasis on how to collect quality data. So just how interested are people in using EPA’s tools for air monitoring? That’s hard to measure, but Williams said the guidebook has been downloaded more than 100,000 times worldwide in the past six to seven months. Also, in early July, the EPA hosted a training event and webinar that drew more than 800 participants. Citizens as cheap labor Scientists realized citizens present a cheap labor pool in a world where funding for research is drying up, said experts who study and coordinate citizen science projects. “There just isn’t a lot of money for ‘big science’ at the EPA” anymore, said Mathew Lippincott, director of production at Public Lab, a nonprofit that develops open-source tools to investigate environmental concerns. “The EPA has begun to reconsider their role, moving away from ‘big science’ and professional judgments toward considering more public data in (the) form of citizen science.” Federal agencies recognized citizen science can help fill important data gaps, said Darlene Cavalier, the founder of SciStarter, a Philadelphia-based group that promotes citizen science and serves as a clearinghouse to connect the general public to more than 600 citizen science projects. For example, Cavalier’s group is working on a soil moisture project with NASA scientists who will use data gathered by citizen scientists on the ground to “complement and validate what is seen from space.” “NASA was clear with us” she said. They said, “‘This is where we have gaps in information’ … so we definitely see where there are clear cut cases where there is a need for the data.” But Ottinger, the Drexel professor, said the EPA’s efforts to help citizens monitor the air may be about “reasserting control” during this rapid proliferation of low-cost air sensors. “I think part of it is, sort of, a deep suspicion and mistrust that anything a community could be producing could be good,” she said. Along similar lines, a law passed in Wyoming in March effectively bans citizen science throughout the state. The law strengthens state trespass laws and makes it illegal to “collect resource data” on any private, public or federal land outside city boundaries. The law was passed after an environmental group took water samples they said proved cattle ranchers (a major industry there) were allowing their cows to graze too close to waterways, which caused high levels of E. coli bacteria in streams. Ottinger said she suspects people are gathering data using these new sensors the EPA doesn’t think is good data, but their projects still get a lot of traction in the media. “It must be driving those scientists nuts,” Ottinger said. Nadia Steinzor, a coordinator with the Oil and Gas Accountability Project at Earthworks, a national environmental advocacy group, said the EPA’s efforts are more likely a response to persistence by environmental groups. “I think that the EPA likely began the citizen air monitoring work because they recognized something that advocates and gas patch residents have said for years: Industry and state regulators aren’t monitoring air quality at [oil and gas] wells and facilities,” she said. If the EPA’s goal really is community-based monitoring, Steinzor said, they need to go further and actually equip communities with air monitors. “They will need to train the residents, distribute tools across a wide area, and conduct plenty of follow-up,” she said. “They will need to help communities interpret the data and figure out how to use it to fight for better protections from air pollution.” Reach Natasha Khan at 412-315-0261 or nkhan(a)publicsource.org. Follow her on Twitter @khantasha. >>>>>>>>> URL for above article, so you see sensors better: http://www.observer-reporter.com/article/20150905/NEWS01/150909635

1 0

Optimized Citizen Air Sensors
by Duane330＠aol.com 06 Sep '15

06 Sep '15

1 0

Audubon Society: North American Birds Are Threatened by Climate Change
by Duane 05 Sep '15

05 Sep '15

http://ecowatch.com/2015/09/05/changing-climate-birds/ Audubon Society: North American Birds Are Threatened by Climate Change From Tim Radford, Climate Change Network, September 5, 2015 Some of North America’s birds may no longer be at home on the range. More than half of 588 studied species could lose more than 50 percent of their flying, breeding and feeding space before the end of the century—because of climate change. The bald eagle, iconic bird of the U.S. is among the North American species threatened by climate change. The researchers who discovered the precarious future facing so many species say they were shocked to find that rising temperatures could have such widespread effects on the continent’s birds. The finding comes from one of the world’s most distinguished ornithological bodies, the U.S. National Audubon Society. Gary Langham, Audubon’s chief scientist, and colleagues report in the Public Library of Science journal PLOS One that they used mathematical models and results from two long-established annual surveys in the breeding season and in winter to estimate future geographic range shifts. Systematic Study The research was based on huge amounts of data. The society’s Christmas Bird Count has been continuous since 1900, and provides a good estimate of numbers in those species that overwinter. And the North American Breeding Bird Survey, a systematic study conducted between mid-May and July in the U.S. and Canada, involves tens of thousands of three-minute counts of every bird seen or heard at 50 stops along a 39-kilometer route. The scientists also used three different climate change scenarios—as carbon dioxide levels rise in the atmosphere because of fossil fuel combustion, so the planet’s average temperature rises and climate changes—to explore the possible futures for bird species in a vast landscape that is home to everything from eagles to hummingbirds. They found that 314 species would lose half or more of their traditional range. Of this total, around 180 species would find that although they would lose the range they had, they would probably be able to acquire new feeding or breeding habitat, as conditions changed. But for 120, the habitat would shrink altogether—that is, there would be nowhere else for them to go. The world’s birds are in trouble—and not just on land or on one continent. Conservation Measures One in eight species is threatened with extinction, although in the better-developed nations, there have been systematic attempts to establish conservation measures. The Audubon study, however, found that the strategies devised and supported now to extend conservation might not be of much use in a world in which climates changed and habitat that had endured for 10,000 years was destroyed, degraded or exploited. “We were shocked to find that half of the bird species in North America are threatened with climate disruption,” Dr Langham says. “Knowing which species are most vulnerable allows us to monitor them carefully, ask new questions, and take action to help avert the worst impacts for birds and people.” See also: www.FrackCheckWV.net

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

MVCAC