# [HISTORY IS MORE THAN DATES IN TIME, NOW AFFECTING
EVERYONE](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/10/history-is-more-than-date…
in-time-now-affecting-everyone/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/DC60DBCA-B25A-4028-B48C-8168AE02118C.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2022/12/DC60DBCA-B25A-4028-B48C-8168AE02118C.jpeg)
COP27 was infiltrated by fossil energy interests, not in the public interest
**THESE EVENTS HAVE SHAPED OUR LIVES, more events to come …….**
**December 7, 1941 ~** Japan bombed Pearl Harbor including the USS West
Virginia battleship;
**December 8, 1941 ~** U.S. declares war on the Empire of Japan;
**December 11, 1941 ~** U.S. declares war on Germany and Italy.
Over the course of the war, B-29s flew 20,000 sorties and dropped 200,000
tonnes (180,000 tons) of bombs. B-29 gunners were credited with shooting down
27 enemy aircraft. In turn 78 B-29s were lost; 57 B-29 and reconnaissance
variants were lost in action and 21 were non-combat losses.
**May 8, 1945 ~** Victory in Europe Day (VE Day);
**August 6, 1945** ~ The first atomic bomb, named Little Boy, was dropped on
Hiroshima from the Enola Gay, a B-29 bomber, at 8:15 AM on The second bomb,
named Fat Man, was dropped on Nagasaki from the Bockscar, also a B-29 bomber,
at 11:02 AM on **August 9, 1945.**
**September 2, 1945 ~** Victory over Japan Day (VJ Day).
**December 11, 1946 ~** UNICEF established. UNICEF, originally called the
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund in full, now officially
United Nations Children's Fund, is an agency of the United Nations responsible
for providing humanitarian and developmental aid to children worldwide. It is
herewith proposed that our UUFM donate $500 to aid in relief for the children
of the Ukraine.
**March 21, 1994 ~** The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC) established an international environmental treaty to combat
"dangerous human interference with the climate system", in part by stabilizing
greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. [International meetings
called Congress of the Parties (COP1 thru COP27) continues negotiations.]
**December 11, 1997 ~** United Nations sponsored a Kyoto Protocol. In short,
the Kyoto Protocol operationalizes the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change by committing industrialized countries and economies in
transition to limit and reduce greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions in accordance
with agreed individual targets. China was not included, and the U.S. failed to
adopt it.
**December 12, 2015 ~** The Paris Agreement (aka Accords) is a legally binding
international treaty on climate change adopted by 196 Parties at COP 21 in
Paris. The goal is to limit global warming to well below 2, preferably to 1.5
degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels. To achieve this long-term
temperature goal, countries aim to reach global peaking of greenhouse gas
emissions as soon as possible to achieve a climate neutral world by mid-
century.
######+++++++######+++++++######+++++++######
**COP27 UPDATE ~ Historic “loss and damage” deal reached at climate talks but
not much else, Channel 4 News Video.
See Video:** <https://youtu.be/MQ06Uq8TyZ0>
**See Also:** <https://youtu.be/YKukrOHMn3I>
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/10/history-is-more-than-dates-in-
time-now-affecting-everyone/>
# [Sustainability Students Learn to Repair Broken Solar Panels at Cornell
Univ.](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/09/sustainability-students-lear…
to-repair-broken-solar-panels-at-cornell-univ/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/1F052C75-FED7-4DB3-9B95-4806EC617A92-300x168.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2022/12/1F052C75-FED7-4DB3-9B95-4806EC617A92.jpeg)
Members of the Solar Panel Reboot team at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
**Sustainability students bring dead solar panels back to life**
From an [Article by Blaine Friedlander, Cornell
Chronicle](https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/12/sustainability-students-
bring-dead-solar-panels-back-life), December 7, 2022
**Students are using polyurethane, resin, epoxy – and gallons of wit – to give
new life to cracked, broken and nonworking solar panels.**
“We’re refurbishing solar panels and that has probably never been taught in
class, as far as we know,” said Anant Gupta ’25, leader of the Cornell
University Sustainability Design (CUSD) Solar Panel Reboot team. “By giving
these panels a second life, we’re learning how to solve problems that don’t
have a definite solution.”
**In 2019, Tobias Hanrath, the Marjorie L. Hart ’50 Professor in Engineering
at the Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, received 1,200
damaged solar panels from the installers of a utility scale solar farm near
Ithaca.**
Hanrath, in turn, gave the panels to the CUSD group and asked them to design,
implement and test refurbishing methods – and evaluate panel durability. The
living-laboratory, circular-economy project paused during the pandemic, but
students returned to the panel problem when the university reopened.
In addition to Gupta, the current team members include master’s degree
students Sarah Alruwaily and Saikant Kamble; and undergraduates En Lo ’25 and
Michelle Yang ’26.
In their Ward Laboratory setup, an extra space to conduct work adjacent to the
Engineering Quad, the students test the panels using a halogen light array
system, originally built by the Cornell chapter of Engineers for a Sustainable
World. The apparatus imitates the sun. The students – who hope to create a
handbook on the process – test each solar panel’s performance and measure
power output.
“In class, you can always look in the textbook and find an answer. You get
your exam back and there’s a solution key,” Gupta said. “As we work through
problems on these broken solar panels, there’s no one to say that’s right or
that’s wrong. We’ve encountered weird problems, that if you look online, you
won’t find an answer. We figure it out for ourselves and I think that’s
valuable.”
**To fix damaged glass, for example, they put the panel on a flat surface and
use liquid resin to repair it. That’s logical. The setback: the resin does not
settle evenly. It bunches up and wrinkles. For now, the students applied
thinner coats – which has worked to some extent.**
Another big issue: fast degradation when the panels are not in use. The
students believe that deterioration occurs in each panel’s junction box system
– the wires that connect panels to each other.
“Every time we test the panels, they degrade,” Gupta said. “We’re sort of
sapping a little bit of life out of them, because we’re disconnecting and
connecting, but we’re trying to figure out how to make sure our power data
results are reliable.”
**One new panel’s output is about 400 watts per hour. After the reboot team
finishes, the students aim to achieve an output of 150 watts. Some of the
renewed panels have gone to the Ithaca Re-Use Center, where they have found
new homes.**
In fact, the group has begun talking with local farmers to sell them
refurbished panels for production agriculture needs – such as powering a small
irrigation system, a water pump, a fan or a few barn lights – where a full-
power electric system isn’t needed.
“We’ve met with farmers and I was amazed by how much a refurbished solar panel
can help them,” Alruwaily said. “It had never crossed my mind that a repaired
item like a solar panel can do that. It was a proverbial light-bulb moment for
me.”
Gupta said the group aims to connect further with the local community and
wishes to find more opportunities for refurbished panels.
For Yang, the team’s youngest member, this was an opportunity to work and
absorb. “Refurbishing panels feels very fresh,” she said. “You go to the Ward
lab and put on gloves, wash down the panels, refurbish them and conduct
testing. We’re learning firsthand about energy.”
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/09/sustainability-students-learn-
to-repair-broken-solar-panels-at-cornell-univ/>
# [The “Dirty Deal” of Senator Manchin Threatens Our
Planet](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/08/the-%e2%80%9cdirty-
deal%e2%80%9d-of-senator-manchin-threatens-our-planet/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/42750114-2DCB-426F-BD7C-10831BB2E4FA-300x198.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2022/12/42750114-2DCB-426F-BD7C-10831BB2E4FA.jpeg)
Join CCAN's Virtual Night of Action to STOP Manchin's Dirty Deal!
**Manchin Releases Permitting Text and Urges Colleagues to Support MVP and
Permitting Amendment to NDAA**
From the [Appeal of Grace Tuttle, Protect Our
Water—Heritage—Rights](https://act.chesapeakeclimate.org/page/46961/data/1),
December 7, 2022
**Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), Chairman of the
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released the full text of the
Building American Energy Security Act of 2022. He also urged his colleagues on
both sides of the aisle to support amending the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) to include this comprehensive, bipartisan permitting reform and
complete the critical Mountain Valley Pipeline.
“Failing to pass the bipartisan, comprehensive energy permitting reform that
our country desperately needs is not an acceptable option. As our energy
security becomes more threatened every day, Americans are demanding Congress
put politics aside and act on commonsense solutions to solve the issues facing
us. The Senate must vote to amend the NDAA to ensure the comprehensive,
bipartisan permitting reform our country desperately needs is included,” said
Chairman Manchin.**
To read the Building American Energy Security Act of 2022 in full, [click
here.](https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/FAED4818-E382-4210-B452…
[To read a summary of the changes, click
here](https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/66701873-A0CC-4DD3-A5A0-….
**CCAN Event:** **RSVP** : **
<https://act.chesapeakeclimate.org/page/46961/data/1>**
**Description: Join CCAN 's Virtual Night of Action to STOP Manchin's Dirty
Deal!**
It's time. Our senators need to hear from us. We will not stand for Manchin's
dirty deal. We can't make policy with backroom negotiations that exclude
impacted communities. We can't keep feeding our addiction to fossil fuels.
**Our goal is to get 150 residents to email their senator in one night to stop
the dirty deal.
6:00-6:15 Latest policy update, Q&A
6:15-6:30 Outreach to personal VA friends and family
6:30-7:00 Textbank with CCAN **
>> _Grace Tuttle, Development & Programs Coordinator
Protect Our Water, Heritage, Rights (POWHR)_
#######+++++++#######+++++++########
**P.S. The members of the US Congress need to hear from you. Senator Joe
Manchin (D-WV) is trying to include his Dirty Deal – to roll back bedrock
environmental protections and force the construction of the Mountain Valley
Pipeline – in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). We can only block
this if enough Senators stand up and promise to vote against the NDAA if it
includes the Dirty Deal.**
**Priority List:**
Senator Kaine (202) 224-4024
Senator Warner (202) 224-2023
Senator Carper (202) 224-2441
Senator Schumer (202) 224-6542
Senator Schatz (202) 224-3934
Senator Murray (202) 224-2621
Senator Reed (202) 224-4642
Senator Leahy (202) 224-4242
Senator Warnock (202) 224-3643
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/08/the-%e2%80%9cdirty-
deal%e2%80%9d-of-senator-manchin-threatens-our-planet/>
# [ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE? ~ Renono Gas-Fired Power Plant Given +18 Months
Extension](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/06/environmental-justice-
renono-gas-fired-power-plant-given-18-months-extension/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/BAA2EE41-79BB-4466-9424-DB94DDCCC61F-300x224.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2022/12/BAA2EE41-79BB-4466-9424-DB94DDCCC61F.jpeg)
Renovo, PA, is 28 miles northwest of Lock Haven on the West Branch of the
Susquehanna River
**GROUPS APPEAL PA-DEP’S EXTENSION OF ILLEGAL POWER PLANT AIR PERMIT**
From the [Web Site Blog of the Clean Air Council, Pittsburgh,
PA](https://cleanair.org), November 22, 2022
RENOVO, PA ~ **The Clean Air Council, PennFuture, and the Center for
Biological Diversity have appealed an extension of Renovo Energy Center’s air
pollution permit for a large gas-fired power plant — a significant source of
new pollution within an environmental justice area.** The extension by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA-DEP) allows the power
plant developer an additional 18 months to build the North-Central
Pennsylvania power plant. **PA-DEP originally permitted the gas-fired plant in
April 2021, but Renovo Energy Center has failed to secure financing to move
forward.**
This extension comes amid an ongoing appeal by the same groups, challenging
the power plant’s air permit, which PA-DEP extended in October. In August, the
Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board ruled in favor of the groups in that
appeal, finding that DEP set pollution limits too high for two harmful
pollutants. That legal challenge continues toward trial on other claims.
Still, rather than allow the illegal permit to lapse, PA-DEP sent Renovo
Energy Center a letter granting the requested extension. PA-DEP did nothing to
alter or fix the illegal permit. In their Notice of Appeal, the environmental
groups object that the extension is illegal because the permit it extends is
illegal and the requirements for an extension were not met.
Renovo is an environmental justice area located along the West Branch
Susquehanna River. The permit authorizes the plant to emit hundreds of tons of
noxious pollutants annually and more greenhouse gases than the City of
Pittsburgh. Pollution from the power plant would impose a cost of billions of
dollars in impacts to health and communities over the course of its lifetime.
The power plant is being developed by Bechtel Corporation, a Virginia-based
multinational engineering corporation.
“Extending a permit that judges just found to be illegal is a slap in the face
to residents of Clinton County and to the rule of law,” said Joseph Otis
Minott, Executive Director and Chief Counsel of Clean Air Council, on behalf
of all three environmental groups filing this appeal. “Why in the world would
DEP break the law just to ensure that a giant fossil fuel power plant can
dirty the community’s air? Renewable energy is cleaner, cheaper, and more
abundant.”
###
**Clean Air Council** is a member-supported, non-profit environmental
organization dedicated to protecting everyone’s right to a healthy
environment. The Council has offices in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and
Wilmington, and works through public education, community advocacy, and
government oversight to ensure enforcement of environmental laws. For more
information, please visit www.cleanair.org.
**PennFuture** is leading the transition to a clean energy economy in
Pennsylvania and beyond. We are protecting our air, water and land, and
empowering citizens to build sustainable communities for future generations.
Visit www.pennfuture.org.
The **Center for Biological Diversity** is a national, nonprofit conservation
organization with more than 1.7 million members and online activists dedicated
to the protection of endangered species and wild places.
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/06/environmental-justice-renono-
gas-fired-power-plant-given-18-months-extension/>
# [GREENHOUSE GASES (GHG) ~ Let’s Attend to All Those Conventional Oil & Gas
Wells](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/05/greenhouse-gases-ghg-
let%e2%80%99s-attend-to-all-those-conventional-oil-gas-wells/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/0AC4B130-F6C3-45D2-B224-91DC36340B70.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2022/12/0AC4B130-F6C3-45D2-B224-91DC36340B70.jpeg)
The Earthjustice group agrees; plug the leaks a.s.a.p.
**Methane mitigation means opportunity for West Virginia**
Guest Essay by [Delegate Evan Hansen, Morgantown Dominion
Post](https://www.dominionpost.com/2022/12/03/guest-essay-methane-mitigatio…
means-opportunity-for-w-va/), Sunday, December 4, 2022
Methane, the primary component of natural gas, is used to heat our homes and
cook our food. Yet, much of this valuable natural resource is wasted into thin
air via emissions from the many smaller, low-producing wells with leak-prone
equipment that dot our landscape. These wells are responsible for roughly half
the emissions at U.S. well sites but account for merely 6% of the nation’s oil
and gas production. This waste does not serve West Virginians or our economy
and must be addressed.
Commonsense standards to cut this waste such as those proposed by the
Environmental Protection Agency will produce good-paying, family-sustaining
jobs and economic opportunities for our residents.
The methane mitigation industry is a rapidly expanding field, deploying robust
technology to capture emissions, generating revenues that will rev up our
economic engine. These jobs create opportunities in communities where natural
gas is being sourced, allowing them to profit from the industry directly.
As West Virginians, we take pride in our reputation as a top energy producer.
The methane mitigation industry will help ensure our status as the fifth-
largest energy producer in the United States and will provide our energy
workers with continued job security as we promote energy security. This is
possible while creating a brighter, healthier future through reduction of the
state’s greenhouse gas footprint.
I hope you’ll join me in encouraging other legislators to support the EPA’s
sensible rule to cut methane emissions from the oil and gas sector, in order
to provide new opportunities for West Virginia’s energy workers.
_>>> Delegate Evan Hansen represents the current House of Delegates 51st
District in Monongalia County._
#######+++++++#######+++++++#######+++++++
**[Clean Air Council, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh& Wilmington,
DE](https://cleanair.org), December 5, 2022**
Clean Air Council and its supporters have worked for years to urge the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce air pollution from new and
existing oil and gas facilities. The gas industry emits large quantities of
climate-changing methane as well as smog-causing and health-harming volatile
organic compounds (VOC), including known carcinogens like benzene.
**Earlier this month, the EPA proposed pollution standards for gas wells and
compressor stations that will better protect public health and help address
the climate crisis by reducing 36 million tons of methane, 9.7 millions tons
of VOCs, and 390,000 tons of air toxics from 2023 to 2035.**
This rule requires air pollution inspections at all oil and gas extraction
facilities regardless of size and includes significant updates to required
pollution control technologies.
While the EPA has taken great steps to reduce air pollution from the gas
industry, we need them to improve this rule by eliminating the **unnecessary
flaring of fracked gas**.
**Comments will be accepted until February 13th and there will be two virtual
public hearings January 10th and 11th.**
[**Click here to urge EPA to adopt stronger pollution
standards.**](https://cleanaircouncil.salsalabs.org/fracking/index.html?eTy…
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/05/greenhouse-gases-ghg-
let%e2%80%99s-attend-to-all-those-conventional-oil-gas-wells/>
# [Greenhouse Gases (GHG) Still the “Elephant in the Room” after
COP27](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/04/greenhouse-gases-ghg-still-
the-%e2%80%9celephant-in-the-room%e2%80%9d/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/54141D15-389E-4651-800C-FCE64A49EE0F-300x150.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2022/12/54141D15-389E-4651-800C-FCE64A49EE0F.jpeg)
The “Elephant in the Room” is not seen but was obvious at COP27
**Op-ed: It’s time to re-think the United Nations’ COP climate negotiations**
From the [Opinion-Editorial by Ruth G. Bell, Environmental Health
News](https://www.ehn.org/climate-change-cop-2658803975.html), December 01,
2022
**When you work on climate change, cognitive dissonance is a daily experience.
I recently visited West Virginia to bask in the glorious colors of fall. All
seemed right with the world — normal in a way that can make one forget the
existential crises humming along in the background.**
I felt the same jarring disconnect as I watched the now concluded Conference
of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC). It might be time to strip away the parts of this annual
ritual that have value and jettison the rest.
The people trying to hammer out solutions to this vexing global challenge are
serious individuals who care deeply. Some have spent entire careers moving
from venue to venue, making their best efforts to find a pathway toward a
safer world. The negotiations are sober and sincere.
The cognitive dissonance arises because they have nothing to offer that
matches the severity of the problem. Carbon emissions might have been worse
without this annual attention, but it’s hard to escape that the current
pathway is essentially business as usual.
What is the return on value of almost 30 years of meetings? We’ve seen record-
breaking increases in global average atmospheric carbon dioxide and little
progress toward concrete support for poor countries that suffer the most from
the climate’s radical changes, though they contributed the least to the
destruction.
**Climate accords built on mutual trust** ~ The international process has
produced breakthroughs. The 2015 Paris Agreement rejected conventional
thinking to recognize that each country must find its own way to lower its
emissions with steadily more ambitious targets. Its innovation was
acknowledging that by working together, each pushing the other to improve,
countries could collectively build the momentum toward progress.
Then came the Trump years. Progress as envisioned in Paris requires mutual
trust. Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord delivered a gut-punch
reminder that agreements are not just about signatures on a page.
Post-Trump, President Biden recommitted to the accord and brought back John
Kerry, who had built the coalition for the Paris success. But even Kerry’s
credibility on the world stage can’t erase the doubts made tangible by Trump’s
destructive behavior.
**Years of talk already (30 years or more)** ~ On one side of the ledger, the
COP is an annual platform for the countries that stand to lose the most from
mounting emissions. For two weeks, at least, they can make their case on a
public stage.
**On the other, the meetings have made those with genuine claims into
supplicants.** For decades, they brought their case to the streets and the
side events. The remedies they propose, like taxing fossil fuel companies’
profits, are out of step with political reality. Their concerns finally became
central this year, but the answer they got was, as characterized by David
Wallace-Wells, a shell, “vague on all of the important points: who will pay
into the fund and how much, who will distribute that money and to whom.”
**The credibility of the COP is eroded by years of failure to meet
commitments, with many wrong turns and the perception of slow bureaucracy.**
And the unstated objective of wealthier countries appears to be to maintain
their current lifestyle, only by changing the source of the energy that powers
it from fossil fuels to more benign inputs. While efficiency has improved, the
U.S. and similar countries continue as wasteful energy consumers. The West
doesn’t seem to want to make the kind of changes that might cause a little
discomfort, much less
**Making the side events the main event** ~ With limited progress toward the
root mission of lowering greenhouse emissions, it’s time to rethink COP.
**Most of the good news on climate comes from technological developments: the
plummeting price and wider availability of solar; advances in wind; improved
efficiency.**
This suggests shifting from formal negotiations to a consultative platform
that facilitates information sharing, financing and partnerships that might
produce faster technological change. This would draw on the strongest parts of
the meeting process, making the side events into the main event.
The hallway conversations are more concrete, informative and realistic than
the negotiations. For example, the New York Times highlighted how
entrepreneurs came together at the World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers
program to develop the Waterplan software that helps companies facilitate
water resource planning. This model could be strengthened at COP.
Annual COP climate talks have also become a magnet for financiers backing the
development of energy-efficient technologies. Regular meetings with that focus
could broker partnerships that might not happen otherwise.
A redesigned COP could also be a place for high-level, off-the-record
conversations. Leaders need to meet, but maybe the current model is too
formal. Although Copenhagen in 2009 is considered in much of the environmental
community to have been a failure, Barack Obama used his time to have
unscripted conversations and infuse a sense of urgency. Admittedly, unplanned
discussions with heads of state are an outlier. But climate has shifted over
time to what is now an ongoing crisis.
More frequent if less formal meetings might better meet the urgency of a
developing crisis, more akin to generals planning a constantly shifting war.
And why not hold these meetings where the impacts on poorer populations can be
more readily grasped — out in the field, so to speak.
**One piece of the current process that works well is the critically important
work of the IPCC,** the independent scientific body founded under the auspices
of the World Meteorological Organization and the U.N, Environment Programme.
The IPCC is independent of the COP, but it provides the increasingly blunt,
comprehensive and credible assessment reports used by UNFCC, policymakers and
a world audience. These reports are widely seen as the most reliable sources
of scientific information on desertification, land degradation, sustainable
land management, food security and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial
ecosystems. Even the deeply conservative U.S. state of Louisiana used IPCC
data to prepare its highly acclaimed Coastal Commission Report.
A benefit of redesign would be to free the UNFCCC itself from the need for
annual conference planning and allow it to be more opportunistic in the best
sense, to focus instead on unexpected possibilities of achievement.
**Real climate opportunities** ~ Asking whether we should reimagine this
convoluted international process will not win me friends in the environmental
community. I am aware that raising these questions can be misinterpreted by
climate deniers and opponents of collective world action.
But not asking the question is equally dangerous, committing us to thinking
that repeating the same routine year after year will somehow lead to a better
result. The real issue is whether we will assure a minimally habitable world
for our children and their children. If the pathway involves stripping down to
the essentials to identify real opportunities of change, so be it.
>>> Ruth G. Bell is a Public Policy Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International
Center for Scholars.
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/04/greenhouse-gases-ghg-still-
the-%e2%80%9celephant-in-the-room%e2%80%9d/>
# [Hydrogen is So Elusive, You May Never See
It?](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/14/hydrogen-is-so-elusive-you-may-
never-see-it/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2022/12/E6B7AA86-F39C-4763-803F-71EEDF34F8C1.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2022/12/E6B7AA86-F39C-4763-803F-71EEDF34F8C1.jpeg)
What if the fossil fuel interests infiltrated the government, as happened at
COP27?
**Much of This Hype for Hydrogen “Energy” is Just Smoke and Mirrors?**
From an [Article by Jim Walsh and Mia DiFelice, Food & Water
Watch](https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2022/12/13/hydrogen-energy-hype/),
December 13, 2022
**The recent outpouring of attention and funds for hydrogen just distracts
from renewables, while doubling down on pollution. Industry advocates herald
hydrogen energy as the “fuel of the future” — but after clearing away the
smokescreen, we find many reasons for skepticism.**
Unfortunately, policy makers worldwide are buying into the industry hype, as
they finally start looking to address the climate crisis. But with a closer
look, it becomes clear that the hydrogen hype is just another greenwashing
effort from fossil fuel interests and Big Ag.
Ultimately, so-called hydrogen energy isn’t an energy source, but rather an
energy-user. Hydrogen “energy” is inherently inefficient, expensive, and
emissions-intensive. This hype will cost taxpayers and ratepayers billions of
dollars, with few — if any — climate benefits to show for it.
**Hydrogen’s Threat to Climate Change**
Proponents claim that hydrogen is a greenhouse gas-free energy source.
However, this ignores the climate impacts of hydrogen production,
transportation, and use. Even so-called green hydrogen, produced with
renewables, can divert renewable energy that could otherwise displace fossil
fuels.
Right now, a whopping 95% of hydrogen we use today comes from methane, sourced
mainly from fracking. This gray hydrogen requires both fossil fuel feedstocks
and fossil heat for production. Currently, hydrogen production accounts for 2%
of global CO2 emissions. Its climate impact is even greater considering
methane leakage from hydrogen production.
You may have heard of blue hydrogen, too, made with carbon capture technology
built to grab CO2 emissions from gray hydrogen production. But research shows
that blue hydrogen is worse for the climate than burning coal. It’s also
costly — billions in U.S. subsidies for carbon capture have only financed
failures.
Moreover, carbon capture claims allow dirty energy companies to continue
operating business-as-usual, just with a shiny new toy attached. This means
more pollution from the fracking that blue and gray hydrogen rely on.
Hydrogen, green or otherwise, has a dirty little secret the industry likes to
ignore: hydrogen in the air has a climate impact 33 times greater than CO2
over 20 years. That means any leaks — which are likely, due to the small size
of hydrogen molecules — would invariably harm the climate.
**The “Fuel of the Future” is Less Fuel, More Farm**
Though boosters call it the “fuel of the future,” we only use a bit of the
hydrogen we produce for energy. The rest goes to a variety of industrial
processes, like steel-making and ammonia production for fertilizers. In the
U.S., almost 70% of hydrogen produced here goes to oil refining.
But worldwide, ammonia fertilizers comprise the vast majority of demand, with
the industry pushing to make the U.S. a major exporter. These fertilizers have
a huge climate impact, thanks to their fossil fuel feedstocks. Moreover,
fertilizer escaping from soil into the air creates nitrous oxide, which has
265 times the global warming potential of CO2. The risks of ammonia are
compounded by the fact it can be very explosive.
The industry suggests “green” hydrogen can make “carbon-free” fertilizer, but
that only greenwashes other issues with fertilizers that need addressing. Big
Ag already over-treats fields, leading to polluted waterways and public health
problems. If the market expands, so will these issues, its climate impacts,
and industry profits.
**Hydrogen “Energy” is Expensive, Inefficient, and Harmful**
Hydrogen is stored, transported, and burned as-is, but it’s also stored and
transported as liquid ammonia. That ammonia is less explosive than pure
hydrogen, but still dangerous. Transitioning hydrogen to ammonia, then back to
hydrogen at end-use, is also energy-intensive.
At the same time, utilities are pushing plans for “hydrogen blending.” That
entails mixing hydrogen with fracked gas in pipelines for home heating and
energy production.
But hydrogen blending can be even more harmful to public health than methane.
Burning it releases six times as much nitrogen oxide as burning methane, which
worsens respiratory harms and other health impacts. Furthermore, it can
require infrastructure changes that increase gas prices for consumers (and
profits for private utilities).
Moreover, this practice is inefficient, emissions-intensive, and doubles down
on the public health risks of fracked gas heating. Any utility or company
advocating for hydrogen in our daily lives is just trying to prolong the life
of their dirty business models.
**Hydrogen Comes for Communities Across the Country**
Hydrogen investment is growing around the world. That support will have dire
consequences if we don’t have guardrails that stop polluting projects hiding
under the guise of “emissions reductions.”
Right now, fossil fuel corporations are planning huge blue hydrogen projects,
touting their “clean” credentials. But no one should call any of these
projects “clean” when they prolong the life of polluting infrastructure,
instead of shutting it down.
**The Ohio River Valley faces one such project: a massive hydrogen hub
spanning Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia. It stands to further harm a
region already threatened by fracking and petrochemical infrastructure.**
Meanwhile, in New Jersey, the fossil fuel industry is pushing legislation to
define hydrogen and other petrochemicals as “renewable natural gas.” This
would allow utilities to charge ratepayers for dirty energy investments, while
claiming them as “renewable.”
In Los Angeles, the City Council is advancing hydrogen plans that will keep
dirty power plants online, rather than shutting them down and replacing them
with clean renewable energy.
**We’ll Stay Vigilant as Hydrogen Hype Rises Higher**
No matter the color, hydrogen is full of problems. It greenwashes and
entrenches harmful industries like oil refining, fracking, and unsustainable
fertilizer. And while there could be a few niche uses for hydrogen energy,
there’s no reason to use it in, say, cars and home heating — other than
corporate profits.
As the hydrogen hype grows, we need to stay wary of industry claims. Before
making any investments in hydrogen or issuing permits, governments must
evaluate the full impact of hydrogen. That includes comparing it to the tools
we already have to transition away from fossil fuels, including
electrification, energy efficiency, and clean renewable energy.
**Warn your friends and family: Don’t believe the hype!**
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2022/12/14/hydrogen-is-so-elusive-you-may-
never-see-it/>