# [Power Plant Residue Ponds Need More Regulation, Whether Active or
Inactive](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/26/power-plant-residue-ponds-
need-more-regulation-whether-active-or-inactive/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/5BB732AA-
BD32-419E-99AB-432750D4F379.jpeg)](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/5BB732AA-BD32-419E-99AB-432750D4F379.jpeg)
Little Blue Run Lake in Beaver County (PA) and Hancock County (WV)
**Changes Proposed for Management of Legacy Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)**
>From the [Roux Group, Long Island, NY](https://info.rouxinc.com/usepa-
proposed-changes-to-ccr-regulations/), May 25, 2023
The USEPA is proposing changes to the CCR regulations for inactive surface
impoundments at inactive electric utilities, referred to as "legacy CCR
surface impoundments." The USEPA is proposing that within tailored compliance
deadlines, owners and operators of legacy CCR surface impoundments comply with
all existing requirements applicable to inactive CCR surface impoundments at
active facilities, except for the location restrictions and liner design
criteria. These are ponds which were exempted from the original rule in 2015.
This action is in response to the August 21, 2018 opinion by the US Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Utility Solid Waste Activities
Group, et al v. EPA), which voided the provision that exempted inactive
impoundments at inactive facilities from the April 17, 2015 CCR rule. The
notice for the proposed rule changes came out on May 18, 2023.
Legacy CCR surface impoundments are more likely to be unlined and unmonitored,
making them more prone to leaks and structural problems than units at
utilities that are currently in service. Legacy CCR surface impoundment and
CCR management units are currently not regulated at the federal level and pose
risks to groundwater.
Therefore, as part of this action, the USEPA is also proposing to establish
groundwater monitoring, corrective action, closure, and post closure care
requirements for all CCR management units (regardless of how or when that CCR
was placed) at regulated CCR facilities. These additional requirements may
result in substantial additional long-term costs for facilities with these
types of impoundments, depending on how legacy CCR impoundments are currently
managed at the state level.
The USEPA will collect public comments on this proposal until July 17, 2023.
The USEPA will host an in-person hearing in Chicago, IL on June 28, 2023 and
an online public hearing on July 12, 2023. Once the rule is finalized, it is
expected to impact as many as 400 CCR units nationwide.
[For more information on legacy CCR surface impoundments and understanding the
proposed changes, use the form provided.](https://info.rouxinc.com/usepa-
proposed-changes-to-ccr-regulations/)
>> Roux Group, 209 Shafter Street, Islandia, NY 11749, United States
#######+++++++#######+++++++#######
**See Also:** [Little Blue Run Lake or Little Blue Run is the largest coal ash
impound in the United
States.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Blue_Run_Lake) FirstEnergy owns
the site, located in Western Pennsylvania and parts of the Northern Panhandle
of West Virginia, and has disposed of billions of gallons of coal waste into
the body of water. Several court cases have been brought against the company
as a result of the damage caused by the company's practices at the site. [From
Wikipedia.]
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/26/power-plant-residue-ponds-need-
more-regulation-whether-active-or-inactive/>
# [New “Workforce Hubs” to Focus on Advanced Technology & Clean
Energy](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/25/new-%e2%80%9cworkforce-
hubs%e2%80%9d-to-focus-on-advanced-technology-clean-energy/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/1B8CDC8F-AC49-44DE-8DF2-83074EF607F2.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2023/05/1B8CDC8F-AC49-44DE-8DF2-83074EF607F2.jpeg)
American Clean Power Association promotes sustainable jobs & electricity
**Pittsburgh named 'workforce hub' in White House initiative**
From a [News Report of WTAE News 4,
Pittsburgh](https://www.wtae.com/article/pittsburgh-workforce-hub-biden-
administration/43910256), May 18, 2023
PITTSBURGH — The Biden administration is creating five workforce hubs around
the U.S. to help bolster the economy, and Pittsburgh has been named as one of
those hubs.
Each hub will work to expand apprenticeship programs, develop career and
technical education programs, and provide support services to help under-
represented students and workers succeed.
**A statement from the White House noted Pittsburgh 's growth in advanced
manufacturing, including robotics and biomanufacturing, as well as clean
energy.**
**The initiative begins this summer. Other regions chosen as hubs were
Columbus, Ohio; Baltimore; Phoenix; and Augusta, Georgia.**
"The goal here is for the administration to work closely with the state, and
particularly local partners, mayors, community groups, unions, to make sure
that workers are getting access to the workforce skills and training that they
need, and really making sure that the communities are ready for all of this
new investment that's going to be coming in and that they're helping to
prepare the workforce to take advantage of these opportunities," said Heather
Boushey, chief economist with the president's Investing in America agenda.
#######+++++++#######+++++++#######
**See Also:** [Appalachian solar developer and non-profit to bring 100 jobs to
West Virginia](https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2023/02/20/appalachian-solar-
developer-and-non-profit-to-bring-100-jobs-to-west-virginia/); Michael Schoek,
PV Magazine, February 20, 2023
Following a recently announced award to the ACT (Appalachian Climate
Technology) Now Coalition, two entities will collaborate on strategies to
recruit, train and employ local workers in the growing renewable energy
industry in West Virginia and around the Appalachian region.
<https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2023/02/20/appalachian-solar-developer-and-non-
profit-to-bring-100-jobs-to-west-virginia/>
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/25/new-%e2%80%9cworkforce-
hubs%e2%80%9d-to-focus-on-advanced-technology-clean-energy/>
# [All Fossil Energy Projects Need to Follow the Environmental
Laws](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/24/all-fossil-energy-projects-ne…
to-follow-the-environmental-laws/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/6C592943-9A14-4802-9698-772CCA63F5F1-300x186.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/6C592943-9A14-4802-9698-772CCA63F5F1.jpeg)
Joe Manchin puts coal & gas projects ahead of the public health & welfare
**U.S. Senators Should Not Grant Exceptions Just For Oil & Gas Projects**
_To: Residents of Appalachia & Concerned Citizens of WV, PA, OH, VA & NC_
.
.
**Joe Manchin is the fossil fuel industry’s favorite senator, and it’s no
surprise why. After we stopped Manchin’s dirty permitting deal three times at
the end of 2022, Manchin is back and trying to do it again. He wants to lock
us into decades of fracking and fossil fuel use, and force the completion of
the Mountain Valley Pipeline.**
It’s time to speak out again and oppose the Dirty Permitting Deal. [Will you
send a message to your Senators and demand that they reject fossil fuel
handouts in any must-pass
legislation?](https://secure.foodandwaterwatch.org/act/tell-your-senators-n…
deals-big-oil-0)
Manchin and his allies in the Senate want to gut our bedrock environmental
laws to make it easier for oil and gas to frack, drill, build pipelines, and
export fossil fuels. This would limit tribal sovereignty and community input,
and weaken protections for our air, water, and planet. Their goal is to make
the country more reliant on coal, oil and gas, and ensure more profits for
their corporate cronies.
Manchin knows that his pro-pollution agenda is deeply unpopular and could
never pass on its own. So after failing last year, Manchin is trying to attach
his dirty permitting deal to must-pass legislation and force Congress’ hand.
We can’t allow them to jeopardize crucial public programs with this dirty
permitting deal.
**[Send a message to your Senators and tell them to reject this dirty
permitting deal.](https://secure.foodandwaterwatch.org/act/tell-your-senators-
no-deals-big-oil-0)**
Last year, Food & Water Watch, our volunteers, and supporters along with a
huge coalition of climate, environmental justice, civil rights, and
progressive organizations stopped this deal with people power because we know
what’s at stake. We showed up in Washington, D.C. and in Congressional offices
across the country, made thousands of calls to representatives and senators,
and even went to jail to protest this awful deal.
**But we’re not out of the woods yet.** To protect our communities and
climate, we can't allow Senator Manchin and his fossil fuel industry backers
to lock us into decades of more emissions that harm the planet and endanger
our food, water, and health.
**Your senators need to hear from you** — will you take a minute to send a
message and tell them to reject the dirty permitting deal?
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/A761DEE4-F770-4479-95A9-E99CD56BACE3.png)](https://…
content/uploads/2023/05/A761DEE4-F770-4479-95A9-E99CD56BACE3.png)
>> _**Onward together, Thomas Meyer,** Strategic Organizing Projects Director,
Food & Water Watch, 1616 P Street, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20036 _
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/24/all-fossil-energy-projects-need-
to-follow-the-environmental-laws/>
# [Drilling & Fracking of Horizontal Gas Wells in Monongalia County,
WV](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/23/drilling-fracking-of-horizontal-
gas-wells-in-monongalia-county-wv/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/07148664-BEAD-4097-B407-3D49819C5B2E-174x300.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/07148664-BEAD-4097-B407-3D49819C5B2E.jpeg)
Also in Monongalia County, this is another application for drilling &
fracking, etc. (click to enlarge)
**Horizontal Natural Gas Well Work Permit Application Notice By Publication**
>> **NOTICE** : _23613 April 5, 12 in Dominion Post Newspaper, Morgantown, WV_
**Notice is hereby given:** Pursuant to West Virginia Code 22-6A-10(e) prior
to filing an application for a permit for a horizontal well the applicant
shall publish in the county in which the well is located or is proposed to be
located a Class II legal advertisement.
**The following applicant intends to apply for a horizontal natural well work
permit which disturbs three acres or more of surface excluding pipelines,
gathering lines and roads or utilizes more than two hundred ten thousand
gallons of water in any thirty day period.**
**Applicant: Northeast Natural Energy, LLC.
Well Number: Dolls Run 3H, 5H, 7H, 9H
Address: 707 Virginia St. E, Suite 1200, Charleston, WV 25301**
Business Conducted: Natural gas production. Location – WV.
County: Monongalia. District: Clay. Quadrangle: Osage.
UTM Coordinate NAD83 Northing: 3H - 4388829.9; 5H - 4388835.9; 7H - 4388817.8;
9H - 4388841.9
UTM coordinate NAD83 Easting: 3H - 577809.8; 5H - 577810.7; 7H - 577808.2; 9H
- 577811.5
Watershed: Dunkard Creek
Coordinate Conversion: To convert the coordinates above into longitude and
latitude, visit: http://tagis. dep.wv.gov/convert/llutm_conus.php Electronic
notification: To receive an email when applications have been received or
issued by the Office of Oil and Gas, visit
http://www.dep.wv.gov/insidedep/Pages/DEPMailingLists.aspx to sign up.
**Reviewing Applications** : Copies of the proposed permit application may be
reviewed at the WV Department of Environmental Protection headquarters,
located at 601 57th Street, SE Charleston, WV 25304(304-926-0450). Full copies
or scans of the proposed permit application will cost $15, whether mailed or
obtained at DEP headquarters. Copies may be requested by calling the office or
by sending an email to DEP.comments(a)wv.gov.
Submitting Comments: Comments may be submitted online at:
https://apps.dep.wv.gov/oog/comments/comments.cfm
or by letter to Permit Review, Office of Oil and Gas, 601 57th Street, SE
Charleston, WV 25304. Please reference the county, well number, and operator
when using this option.
Regardless of format for comment submissions, they must be received no later
than thirty days after the permit application is received by the Office of Oil
and Gas. (deadline - May 25)
NOTE: For information related to horizontal drilling visit:
www.dep.wv.gov/oil-and-gas/pages/default.aspx
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/23/drilling-fracking-of-horizontal-
gas-wells-in-monongalia-county-wv/>
# [Damaging El Niño Weather Predicted Costing $
Trillions](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/22/damaging-el-nino-weather-
predicted-costing-trillions/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/AEADC8BA-3745-4F6A-9C9F-84BB7439B353-300x201.png)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/AEADC8BA-3745-4F6A-9C9F-84BB7439B353.png)
El Niño weather predicted for northern hemisphere
**Study Warns El Niño Could Cost Global Economy $84 Trillion by 2100**
.
.
From the [Article by Jessica Corbett, Common
Dreams](https://www.commondreams.org/news/el-nino-climate-global-economy), May
19, 2023
.
.
**With experts anticipating El Niño will return in the months ahead, a pair of
Dartmouth College researchers warned this week that the long-term cost to the
global economy could be as much as $3 trillion by 2029 — which could be
largely felt by poorer countries.**
**The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), a climate pattern that affects sea
surface temperatures across the tropical Pacific Ocean, has three phases: the
cooler La Niña; neutral, which the world is now experiencing; and the warmer
El Niño that is expected soon.**
**" El Niño triggers far-reaching changes in weather that result in
devastating floods, crop-killing droughts, plummeting fish populations, and an
uptick in tropical diseases," explained a Dartmouth statement about the study,
published in the journal Science.**
Doctoral candidate Christopher Callahan and Justin Mankin, an assistant
professor of geography at the college, examined economic conditions for
several years after the 1982-83 and 1997-98 El Niño events. They connected
those two warm phases to $4.1 trillion and $5.7 trillion in global income
losses, respectively — far higher than previous estimates.
"El Niño amplifies the wider inequities in climate change, disproportionately
impacting the least resilient and prepared among us.mWe can say with certainty
that societies and economies absolutely do not just take a hit and recover,"
said Callahan, the study's lead author, noting that their data suggest an El
Niño-related downturn could last up to 14 years or longer.
"In the tropics and places that experience the effects of El Niño, you get a
persistent signature during which growth is delayed for at least five years,"
he continued. "The aggregate price tag on these events has not ever been fully
quantified — you have to add up all the depressed growth moving forward, not
just when the event is happening."
The pair found that the gross domestic product of the United States was
roughly 3% lower in 1988 and 2003 than it would have been without the
preceding El Niño events— and, for the latter phase, GDPs in coastal tropical
countries were more than 10% lower.
"The global pattern of El Niño's effect on the climate and on the prosperity
of different countries reflects the unequal distribution of wealth and climate
risk — not to mention the responsibility for climate change — worldwide," said
Mankin. "El Niño amplifies the wider inequities in climate change,
disproportionately impacting the least resilient and prepared among us."
"The duration and magnitude of the financial repercussions we uncovered
suggests to me that we are maladapted to the climate we have," he added. "Our
accounting dramatically raises the cost estimate of doing nothing. We need to
both mitigate climate change and invest more in El Niño prediction and
adaptation because these events will only amplify the future costs of global
warming."
**Callahan and Mankin 's study was released the same day as research published
in the journal Nature Reviews Earth and Environment that found human-caused
global heating has likely made El Niños and La Niñas "more frequent and more
extreme."**
Models for the latter research showed that sea surface temperature extremes
were about 10% more intense for the six decades after 1960, compared with the
previous 60 years. Co-author Mike McPhaden, a senior research scientist at the
U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said that "the
big events pack the most punch, so even though 10% doesn't sound like much, it
juices up the strongest and most societally relevant year-to-year climate
fluctuation on the planet."
**" In practical terms, this translates into more extreme and frequent
droughts, floods, heatwaves, wildfires, and severe storms, just like we
observed during the recent triple dip La Niña that ended in March," McPhaden
told The Guardian.**
Given that observed trend and expectations it will continue, the Dartmouth
researchers project that even if countries pursue their pledges to cut planet-
heating emissions, global economic losses related to El Niño could reach $84
trillion for the 21st century.
"Our welfare is affected by our global economy, and our global economy is tied
to the climate," he said. "When you ask how costly climate change is, you can
start by asking how costly climate variation is. We're showing here that such
variation, as embodied in El Niño, is incredibly costly and stagnates growth
for years, which led us to cost estimates that are orders of magnitudes larger
than previous ones."
The Associated Press reported that "some — but not all — outside economists
have issues with the new research out of Dartmouth College, saying its damage
estimates are too big." However, McPhaden welcomed the findings, telling the
AP that he has long believed previous estimates were far too low and the "big
loser during El Niño is the Global South."
**While the Dartmouth projections suggest 2023 ′s looming warm phase could
cost trillions of dollars, the NOAA scientist stressed that "the economic
impacts of the El Niño that is predicted for later this year will depend on
how strong it is."**
"Monster El Niños" like the 1997-98 event "can be hugely damaging with
lingering effects that carry over into following years," he said. "On the
other hand, if it turns out to be a garden variety El Niño, the consequences
may be more muted and the recovery time shortened."
#######+++++++#######+++++++#######
**See Also:** [ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions ~ Update
prepared by: Climate Prediction
Center](https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/e…
status-fcsts-web.pdf) / NCEP, 22May2023
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/22/damaging-el-nino-weather-
predicted-costing-trillions/>
# [Fracking Chemicals ~ 282 Million Pounds Used from 2014 to 2021 Not
Regulated by Safe Drinking Water
Act](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/20/fracking-chemicals-282-million-
pounds-used-from-2014-to-2021-not-regulated-by-safe-drinking-water-act/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/C87EDA79-587D-4D8D-9E48-E4E96E8C384B.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2023/05/C87EDA79-587D-4D8D-9E48-E4E96E8C384B.jpeg)
Frack Focus is now at Version 3, with Version 4 promised this year
**How the “Halliburton Loophole” lets fracking companies pollute water with no
oversight**
From the [Article by Kristina Marusic, Environmental Health
News](https://www.ehn.org/halliburton-loophole-2659983182.html/), May 18, 2023
Fracking companies used more than 282 million pounds of hazardous chemicals
from 2014 to 2021 with no federal oversight, according to a new study.
The study, published in Environmental Pollution, is the first to examine the
“Halliburton Loophole,” which exempts fracking from federal regulation under
the Safe Drinking Water Act.
The provision, passed by Congress as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005,
was endorsed by then-Vice President Dick Cheney, who formerly served as the
CEO of Halliburton. The company patented fracking technologies in the 1940s
and is still one of the top suppliers of fracking fluids in the world.
The study found that from 2014 through 2021, 62% to 73% of reported fracking
jobs each year used at least one chemical that’s categorized as harmful to
human health and the environment under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
These chemicals include carcinogens like formaldehyde, arsenic and benzene;
possible carcinogens like acrylamide and naphthalene; and ethylene glycol,
which can damage the kidneys, nerves and respiratory system.
According to the study, the fracking industry reported using at least 250
million pounds of ethylene glycol, 10 million pounds of naphthalene, 1.8
million pounds of formaldehyde, 4.6 million pounds of acrylamide, 7.5 million
pounds of benzene and 590 pounds of arsenic from 2014 to 2021, in addition to
more than a dozen other chemicals regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, extracts natural oil and gas from the Earth
by drilling deep wells and injecting huge volumes of water and chemicals at
high pressure. Previous research has shown that fracking chemicals can wind up
in drinking water and impact human health. Only a handful of the toxic
chemicals used by the industry are regulated in drinking water, and those that
aren’t may not be filtered or monitored by public water utilities. The
Environmental Working Group, a public health advocacy nonprofit, estimates
that current levels of contamination in drinking water — most of which meet
legal standards — could cause 100,000 cancer cases in the U.S.
“Because of the Halliburton Loophole and gaps in reporting, the environmental
health and justice impacts of fracking aren’t being properly assessed,” Vivian
Underhill, lead author of the study and a postdoctoral researcher at
Northeastern University, told Environmental Health News (EHN).
Underhill said the quantities of these chemicals are likely an underestimate,
since not all states require disclosure of fracking chemicals, and most states
requiring disclosure allow companies to keep some chemicals secret if they say
the mixtures are proprietary.
During the same time period, fracking companies reported using about 7.2
billion pounds of proprietary chemicals – more than 25 times the total mass of
chemicals listed under the Safe Drinking Water Act that they reported. There’s
no way to know what proportion of those chemicals are hazardous.
“We saw proprietary chemicals in 77% of disclosures in 2015, and that number
was up to 88% in 2021,” said Underhill. “The use of trade secrets is steadily
increasing, and that’s definitely concerning.”
**A backroom deal with public consequences** ~ The Safe Drinking Water Act
regulates both public drinking water contaminants and the injection of toxic
chemicals underground.
“It was Halliburton’s CEO who first and most strongly lobbied for this
loophole, and that company is indeed benefiting most from this exemption
today,” said Underhill.
Other industries that inject hazardous chemicals underground where they could
contaminate water supplies, like mining and hazardous waste disposal, are
subject to federal regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The fracking
industry is exempt from these regulations.
“The oil and gas program under the Safe Drinking Water Act was already weak,
but the Halliburton Loophole gouged it even bigger for fracking specifically,”
Erik Olson, an attorney, Safe Drinking Water Act expert and senior strategist
at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told EHN. “Oil and gas wells are
basically to be regulated by the states under a much more flexible oversight
scheme, and those programs are very weak in many states with a big oil and gas
presence.”
Previous research has demonstrated public health harms from this lack of
oversight in states like Pennsylvania and Colorado.
**The fracking industry agreed to publicly disclose some chemicals it uses in
response to public concern about threats to water. But Underhill and Olson say
those disclosures aren’t useful because of the trade secrets provision.**
“This study shows us that there are a lot of very toxic chemicals being
injected underground by this industry,” Olson said. “But it’s hard to say
there’s any kind of meaningful disclosure if we still don’t know what most of
these chemicals are or how toxic they are.”
**Stronger fracking regulations** **~ In light of their findings, Underhill
and her coauthors are urging Congress to repeal the Halliburton Loophole and
regulate the fracking industry under the Safe Drinking Water Act.**
Olson is also in favor of closing the Halliburton Loophole. “This loophole was
a backroom deal folded into legislation with no public debate, and they’ve
never justified to the public why it’s needed,” he said. “That’s because it’s
not needed. It was just raw political power that enabled them to get it
enacted.”
Underhill and her coauthors are also urging Congress to pass a law requiring
full disclosure of all chemicals used in fracking, including proprietary
chemicals, and housing it in a centralized database with federal oversight.
The American Petroleum Institute, a trade association representing the oil and
gas industry, opposes that idea. The organization’s “issue paper” on chemical
disclosures for the fracking industry notes that fracking fluid producers have
agreed to disclose details about proprietary chemicals to health care
professionals, emergency responders and regulatory agency representatives
“when it is appropriate.”
The paper acknowledges that trade secrets have caused concern, but concludes,
“the compromise of limited disclosure when need is justified is a sound
response. Protection of [intellectual property] rights is fundamental to the
free market economy in which we all work and thrive.”
**Making data on fracking chemicals more accessible**
Researchers are just starting to figure out the cumulative impacts of the
Halliburton Loophole because, until recently, it was difficult to obtain
nationwide data on fracking disclosures.
**The industry uses a site called FracFocus for public disclosures.** While
it’s possible to look at chemical disclosures for individual wells through the
site, it’s virtually impossible to obtain data in a format that allows for
large-scale analysis.
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/AA7F93B4-E6C6-4DC2-BC60-CDCC1276A486.png)](https://…
content/uploads/2023/05/AA7F93B4-E6C6-4DC2-BC60-CDCC1276A486.png)
Open-FF is now under development in the public interest
**But a new, open-source program called Open-FF is changing that.**
“I was trying to get information from FracFocus and I realized it’s not really
a database,” Gary Allison, who developed Open-FF, told EHN. “It takes a lot of
work to get the data to the point where you can actually use it.”
One issue was that FracFocus uses non-standardized names for companies and
chemicals. For example, Allison had to account for more than 80 variations of
the word “Halliburton” including misspellings, typos and abbreviations to make
it possible to search the database for all chemicals made by the company.
“Before now, it was incredibly hard to download data from FracFocus that
allows for systematic analysis or investigation,” Underhill said. “Now this
data can finally be used effectively by researchers.”
Allison noted that anyone can use the program — not just scientists and
researchers.
“Most people don’t have fluency in chemistry, so it can be really overwhelming
to look at these data sheets and make sense of what’s happening,” he said. “I
hope to get **Open-FF** to the point where members of the public can easily
log into the site and find out what chemicals are being put into the ground
near their homes.”
#####++++++#####++++++######
[Information Released by Frack Focus on April 10,
2022](https://fracfocus.org/learn/about-fracfocus)
August 2021 - FracFocus is used as the only national regulatory reporting
system for 27 Oil and Gas States. It contains over 184,000 disclosures with
over 5 million chemicals records coming from more than 1,600 registered
companies.
December 2021 - FracFocus design for the next version is ongoing with expected
development of FracFocus 4.0 in 2022.
2023 - FracFocus 4.0 slated for release, enabling reporting of water used in
hydraulic fracturing jobs by source and quality.
**Note ~** “FracFocus is a victory for transparency and good governance, and
an example of what is possible when the industry works with state regulators
and environmental groups to solve urgent challenges in managing the local
impacts of hydraulic fracturing. FracFocus remains one of the best national
repositories of oil and gas data, and paves the way for a new era of open data
in this field.” -– Adam Peltz, Environmental Defense Fund
#####++++++##########+++++######
**Related** : [Fractured — The body burden of living near
fracking](https://www.ehn.org/fractured-series-on-fracking-
pollution-2650624600.html)
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/20/fracking-chemicals-282-million-
pounds-used-from-2014-to-2021-not-regulated-by-safe-drinking-water-act/>
# [WVU Institute for Sustainability and Energy Research (WISER) ~ What a
Name!](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/19/wvu-institute-for-
sustainability-and-energy-research-wiser-what-a-name/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/401AF379-E5AF-431B-BD58-584C93BDE66F-300x200.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/401AF379-E5AF-431B-BD58-584C93BDE66F.jpeg)
Sustainability and Energy Research are related but distinct ….
**WVU Energy Institute transforming to serve emerging energy trends**
.
.
From an [Article posted by WVU
Today](https://wvutoday.wvu.edu/stories/2023/05/17/wvu-energy-institute-
transforming-to-serve-emerging-energy-trends), May 17, 2023
.
.
West Virginia University, a leader in energy research and innovation, is
repositioning the institutes within its Research Office to best meet industry-
wide transitions.
**The Energy Institute will transform into the WVU Institute for
Sustainability and Energy Research ( WISER), effective July 1, with Sam Taylor
as its director. Taylor will build the new Institute on the foundation of the
Energy Institute laid by James Wood.**
Vice President for Research Fred King said the revamping of the Institute into
WISER is more than just a name change.
“This restructuring is part of the University’s transformation to stay ahead
of trends in the real world,” King said. “It’ll better enable us to support
and engage at an R1 level when it comes to sustainability and energy
transition. While it appears we are evolving, we also still want to stay true
to the history and tradition of energy in the state.”
WISER will serve as the University’s coordinating institution for energy and
sustainability research by collaborating with stakeholders across campus, the
state and the globe to stimulate energy and environmental economic development
in West Virginia and beyond.
Taylor will assume his new leadership role after serving as assistant director
of strategic partnerships and technology with the Energy Institute since 2017.
As director of WISER, Taylor will also oversee the National Alternative Fuels
Training Consortium. In recent years, Taylor has worked with policymakers,
government entities and environmental groups on pressing energy issues.
“WISER will align the talents and efforts of the Energy Institute toward a
vision of sustainability, including energy, while seeking to understand and
respect what that means for residents of West Virginia and the larger region,”
Taylor said. “As a West Virginia native, I understand that adaptation,
resilience and independence are ‘core values’ of this region, and we need to
structure our work, using the capabilities of West Virginia University, to
support these values. To do this effectively, we must focus on relationships.”
Taylor’s expertise covers energy development, energy geosciences including
geothermal, hydrogen storage and carbon dioxide storage, transportation energy
utilization, renewable and nonrenewable energy research, clean energy and
advanced energy technologies.
**In another restructuring move, the West Virginia Water Research Institute
will shift from the Energy Institute and operate as its own entity reporting
directly to the Research Office, also effective July 1.**
For more than 30 years, WVWRI has focused on environmental restoration
including mine land reclamation, brownfields redevelopment and watershed
restoration.
**WVWRI is led by Director Paul Ziemkiewicz, who has raised the profile of the
group to an international level with its innovations in treating acid mine
drainage and extracting rare earth elements.**
Recently, a research team headed by Ziemkiewicz was awarded $8 million in U.S.
Department of Energy funding to begin designing, constructing and operating a
pre-commercial demonstration facility for separating and refining rare earth
elements and critical minerals.
Rare earth element technologies, which power everything from smartphones to
the nation’s missile guidance system, could serve as a game changer for the
environment and the domestic economy.
“Since acid mine drainage is the principal pollutant in the state, we’ve
devoted a lot of our attention toward making sure that agencies, citizen
watershed associations and industry have the tools and policies in place to
turn dead streams into recreational fisheries,” Ziemkiewicz said. “About seven
years ago, with the help of the U.S. Department of Energy, we started
developing a way to treat acid mine drainage while economically recovering
rare earth elements and critical materials.”
With DOE support and in collaboration with the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, WVWRI has a full-scale demonstration facility near
Mount Storm. Ziemkiewicz said he hopes to replicate that model across the
country to eventually create a commercially viable rare earth supply chain
that could provide the materials needed for advanced, green technologies and
defense production.
“The team at WVWRI is excited about this new organizational model which will
streamline relationships with the WVU administration and the faculty,” he
said. “We’ve built a successful organization and generate over $6 million in
research funding each year. We look forward to developing new research lines
for what, arguably, is one of the nation’s premier water research institutes.”
-WVU-
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/19/wvu-institute-for-
sustainability-and-energy-research-wiser-what-a-name/>
# [Western Wildfires Resulting in Costly Damages & Widespread Air
Pollution](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/18/western-wildfires-
resulting-in-costly-damages-widespread-air-pollution/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/D58B4038-C032-473D-B47D-8EF8F6EA463C.jpeg)](https:/…
content/uploads/2023/05/D58B4038-C032-473D-B47D-8EF8F6EA463C.jpeg)
Widespread fires do extensive local damages then regional disruption and long
range pollution
**A third of the West’s burned forests can be traced to fossil fuel
companies**
.
.
.
From the [Article by Kate Yoder, The Grist Online
Magazine](https://grist.org/accountability/study-a-third-of-the-wests-burne…
forests-can-be-traced-to-fossil-fuel-companies/), May 16, 2023
.
.
.
The American West has always had forest fires — just not like this. Blazes are
spreading further and burning longer, incinerating towns and exposing millions
of people to noxious smoke. While a century of fire suppression and other land
management choices contribute to the severity, climate change is a key factor
fueling these fires, roughly doubling the acreage burned over the last 40
years. A new study takes this connection one step further, making the case
that a significant chunk of burned forests — nearly 20 million acres — can be
traced back to major fossil fuel companies.
The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Research
Letters on Tuesday, is the first to quantify how corporate emissions have made
wildfires worse. Experts say the new research could help advance growing
efforts to take polluters to court and hold polluters accountable for climate-
fueled disasters.
“These companies should be held accountable for their fair share of the
damages that they’ve caused,” said Carly Phillips, a coauthor of the new study
and a research scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the
Union of Concerned Scientists. “They lied and engaged in this orchestrated
campaign of deception for years, and it didn’t have to be this way, right?”
Researchers from the Union of Concerned Scientists and the University of
California, Merced, found that 37 percent of forest burned across the western
United States and southwestern Canada since 1986 can be linked to carbon
pollution from 88 of the world’s largest oil, gas, and coal companies. That
group includes Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP, and Shell; state-owned oil producers
like Saudi Aramco and Gazprom; and cement manufacturers. Researchers
considered emissions directly emitted by these companies’ operations as well
as the indirect emissions from the products they sold.
Since 2017, cities and states have filed around 20 lawsuits against fossil
fuel companies based on state laws that prohibit deceptive advertising,
seeking money to adapt to the effects of climate change. The suits were set in
motion by investigations showing that Exxon, Shell, and coal companies had
known about the dangers of skyrocketing carbon emissions for decades, but
publicly downplayed the threat. After years of delays, the Supreme Court
declined to get involved in these cases last month, clearing the way for them
to proceed — potentially to jury trials.
The study comes as spring fires scorch western Canada during an unusually hot
and dry spring, with about 1 million acres burning across the province of
Alberta. An early heat wave pushed temperatures above 90 degrees in parts of
the typically temperate Pacific Northwest over the weekend, with Seattle and
Portland breaking heat records at least three days in a row. The same heat
dome is expected to fan the flames of nearly 90 fires burning across Alberta.
It’s hard to draw a direct line between global warming and wildfires. But
recent advances in “attribution science,” the field that identifies climate
change’s role in heat waves, droughts, rising seas, and other phenomena, have
made it possible to quantify its effect on fires. The new study relies on a
key risk factor called the “vapor pressure deficit,” a measure of how
“thirsty” the atmosphere is. Hotter temperatures cause moisture to be pulled
out of vegetation, turning forests into tinderboxes just waiting for a spark.
To figure out how companies’ emissions contributed to fire-danger conditions
in the West, researchers built on a previous study that linked emissions from
88 big fossil fuel producers to rising temperatures. Then they compared two
models of how dry forests would be under different climate scenarios — one
modeled on the real world, and the other excluding the emissions associated
with the 88 companies.
“The major contribution of this study is to connect all of the dots between
specific sources of human-related carbon emissions and recent increases in
forest fire activity,” said Philip Higuera, a professor of fire ecology at the
University of Montana who was not involved in the study. “Most of the links
have been well known for a long time, but this is the first study to connect
the dots, quantitatively.”
Exxon and BP did not respond to Grist’s request to comment in time for
publication.
Jessica Wentz, a fellow at Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate
Change Law, thought the findings could be used to support existing lawsuits,
or provide the impetus for other local governments to file their own. Wentz
said the research might be relevant to a case in Colorado, where the city and
county of Boulder, along with San Miguel County, sued Suncor Energy and
ExxonMobil, seeking millions of dollars to update their infrastructure to
withstand climate change. “That’s the one lawsuit where wildfire-related
damages are forefront and central,” Wentz said.
Translating the research to a specific court case could prove thorny, though.
The study looked at a large region, the whole North American West, and the
aggregate of 88 companies’ emissions. It’s possible that attorneys could use
the new research to calculate wildfire risk over a smaller area — say, Boulder
County — but it would require some extrapolation. For calculating damages, a
court might want to see a more fine-grained analysis, Wentz said. “It’s really
a totally open question of how courts will look at the evidence, and just how
granular will plaintiffs need to be in terms of providing scientific data to
support their claims. We just don’t know yet.”
In a way, the long delays in these climate court cases have actually given
some ammunition to cities and states looking to hold fossil fuel companies
accountable. The extra time has allowed the science of climate attribution to
mature, so that if these cases end up going to trials, cities and states have
more evidence to support their case. “It’s sort of a weird silver lining,”
Wentz said.
xxx
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/18/western-wildfires-resulting-in-
costly-damages-widespread-air-pollution/>
# [Advanced Plastic Recycling is Highly Suspect of
“Greenwashing”](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/17/advanced-plastic-
recycling-is-highly-suspect-of-%e2%80%9cgreenwashing%e2%80%9d/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/89DCC529-5B45-4289-84A8-7A8946645A72-300x156.png)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/89DCC529-5B45-4289-84A8-7A8946645A72.png)
American Chemistry Council (ACC) promotes crazy stuff!
**Stop chemical recycling, processes that can generate even more pollution**
.
.
From the [Climate Reality
Project](https://www.climaterealityproject.org/action/stop-chemical-
recycling/), May 16, 2023
.
.
“Advanced recycling” and “chemical recycling” are the two new greenwashed
terms in town. The process primarily involves converting plastic into fuel. A
pretty expensive and roundabout way of burning fossil fuels, if you ask us.
**The chemicals industry is lobbying hard to get two types of these plastic-
to-fuel incinerators - pyrolysis and gasification - exempt from regulations
under the Clean Air Act. And the American Chemistry Council (ACC) recently
announced it would try to introduce legislation that would promote these false
solutions to our plastic waste crisis.**
This is incredibly dangerous, given that the US EPA reportedly found that
pollution from an associated plastic-based fuel poses a one-in-four risk of
cancer.
Letting these incinerators escape the Clean Air Act would particularly harm
the low-income communities and communities of color where most pyrolysis and
gasification facilities exist, and where they are likely to be sited in the
future. It would also set a terrible precedent, encouraging other polluting
industries to pursue their own special exemptions.
Take action now. Demand that your representatives call on the Biden
Administration to reject these proposed exemptions under the Clean Air Act and
vote NO on any such legislation that promotes these false solutions to our
plastic waste crisis.
>>>>>>>…………………>>>>>>>…………………>>>>>>>
**See Also:** [RECYCLING LIES: “CHEMICAL RECYCLING” OF PLASTIC IS JUST
GREENWASHING INCINERATION](https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/chemical-
recycling-greenwashing-incineration-ib.pdf), Natural Resources Defense Council
[NRDC], February 2022
<https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/chemical-recycling-greenwashing-
incineration-ib.pdf>
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/17/advanced-plastic-recycling-is-
highly-suspect-of-%e2%80%9cgreenwashing%e2%80%9d/>
# [SPEAK UP NOW! ~ The Mountain Valley Pipeline is Dangerous &
Unnecessary](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/16/speak-up-now-the-
mountain-valley-pipeline-is-dangerous-unnecessary/)
[![](https://www.frackcheckwv.net/wp-
content/uploads/2023/05/740FFEC0-875A-4660-B523-75515D6FDFDD-300x112.jpg)](…
content/uploads/2023/05/740FFEC0-875A-4660-B523-75515D6FDFDD.jpeg)
At 42 inches in diameter, the MVP exceeds size of installed long distance gas
pipelines
**SUBMIT COMMENTS ON M.V.P. BECAUSE NOW IS THE CRITICAL TIME**
From the [West Virginia Rivers
Coalition](https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/baesa/index.html?eType=EmailBlast…,
May 16, 2023
Earlier this month, West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin introduced The Building
American Energy Security Act of 2023. This legislation changes how federal
agencies handle energy projects and takes the dangerous and unprecedented step
of requiring agencies to issue all permits within 30 days for the Mountain
Valley Pipeline (MVP), without further public involvement and without judicial
review.
**Make no mistake: No project should be exempt from full protections afforded
by cornerstone laws like the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act,
which the MVP has a long history of violating.**
While there is much debate over the need for permitting reform to aid in our
energy transition, this provision is reckless and unfair. Still, together, we
can send a united message to our leaders to protect West Virginians and our
right to fair and equal treatment under the law.
**Today, we are calling on our supporters to contact President Joe Biden, Vice
President Kamala Harris, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to tell them
that fast-tracking fossil fuel projects puts our communities and the planet at
risk. Can we count on you to take action with us today?**
[Tell our leaders in Washington: Reject the unjust approval of the Mountain
Valley
Pipeline.→](https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/baesa/index.html?eType=EmailBlas…
After you've signed your name and added your comments, could you forward the
link to your family and friends to ask them to use their voices to stand with
West Virginians’ rights to fair and equal protections?
Together we have built a powerful coalition. With your continued support,
we'll keep growing our numbers to protect access to clean water.
[Thank you for taking action today. Add Your
Voice!](https://wvrivers.salsalabs.org/baesa/index.html?eType=EmailBlastCon…
>> _In Solidarity, WV Rivers Coalition_
[WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION](https://wvrivers.org)
3501 MacCorkle Ave SE #129 | Charleston, West Virginia 25304
304-637-7201 | wvrivers(a)wvrivers.org
URL: <https://www.frackcheckwv.net/2023/05/16/speak-up-now-the-mountain-
valley-pipeline-is-dangerous-unnecessary/>